Hi there...I will try to explain my problem so it makes sense. Is there a situation in which a high detail photo (landscape and a close up of leaves on rocks with water, taken in raw and ending up at 9 Megs after converted to JPG) would look BAD when printed as an 8 x 10? I got some printed and they look as though there is poor detail, when I KNOW there is enough detail/pixels for up to 20 x 30!!! The shots were taken with tripod and remote shutter trigger, so there is no issue of blur. Would a shot like this look better at a much larger print size? Am I trying to cram too much into too little space? Is there some rule about pixels, print size, etc? Thanks for any input!!!