as i was falling asleep last night, i was thinking about this forum (yes, i have a life, but photography really is my passion and i very much enjoy this forum!) and i was thinking about all the interesting topics posted here. my line of thought then shifted, and i was thinking about photography itself, and how it is an art as well as a science. i began to think about my own strengths and weaknesses, and concluded i can claim more strength on the art side, less on the science. i am not yet very good at the technical aspects of my craft, but i am getting there (with help from you guys!). so, my question: are you more of a scientist (excellent with the technical aspects) or more of an artist (you "got the eye") or a wonderful balance of both (my ultimate goal)?