Raw or Jpeg?

Discussion in 'Graphics Programs and Photo Gallery' started by coolbryan84, Dec 30, 2009.

  1. coolbryan84
    Offline

    coolbryan84 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    kentucky, US
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    hello all! i have a quick question. I dont own any post processing software more intuitive than iphoto's adjustments.

    i am confused: do i shoot in raw or jpeg
    why one over the other and what do you prefer?
    thanks!
  2. Dominantly
    Offline

    Dominantly New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA (RB)
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +163 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    raw
  3. bigtwinky
    Offline

    bigtwinky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    4,814
    Likes Received:
    281
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Montreal
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +282 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    do a search on the forum for RAW vs JPG or something similar, this topic is often discussed at lenghts
  4. Josh66
    Offline

    Josh66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,579
    Likes Received:
    1,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,225 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Yeah - RAW.

    Your camera should have came with RAW processing software, if it can shoot RAW. (There are also 3rd party products available)
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2009
  5. patrickt
    Offline

    patrickt New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Oaxaca, Mexico
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    For me, if you shoot snapshots and print with no processing or shoot for the news media and have to send your photos in quickly or maybe if you're shooting photos to be used in court then you would use JPEG. There might be some other examples of JPEG appropriate uses that I'm not thinking of right now. Since I'm not doing any of those things, I shoot raw.
  6. Shockey
    Offline

    Shockey New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Boise Idaho
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    If you want to do post processing shoot raw.
    If you want to use them straight from the camera shoot jpeg.
  7. JustForSneaks07
    Offline

    JustForSneaks07 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Fernando Valley
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    shoot Raw if you wanna change the exposures later, but it takes a while to load cause the files are larger than JPEG
  8. rocdoc
    Offline

    rocdoc New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I shoot exclusively raw for the past couple of years. It depends on your habits. If you shoot 500 pics at a party and want to keep 400 of them, it would be very cumbersome. I spent several days visiting family and hiking, took 300 pics and processed and shared about 20. So that is doable, I do it rarely. If that is your approach, and you pick and choose your shots, raw is a no-brainer. You can get exactly the look you want, keep your white balance forever on auto and not care etc. You do need a dedicated processing software though.
  9. IgsEMT
    Offline

    IgsEMT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    NYC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +48 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    coolbryan,
    I'd STRONGLY recomend you to search this topic. It has been talked about over and over and over again.
    there are advantages and disadvantages to both but only you can decide what works for you.
    If, after your search you are still confused, PM or try to find me on aim with same name as here and we can further discuss it.

    Good luck and happy new year!
    good luck
  10. KmH
    Offline

    KmH Helping photographers learn to fish

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    34,320
    Likes Received:
    4,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,199 / 4
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    RAW images require post processing. Every single one that is a keeper.

    JPEGs come out of the camera already post processed to one degree or another.

    If you don't have, or know how to use image editing software, shoot JPEG.

    I've never used iphoto and don't know what it can/cannot do.
  11. Pugs
    Offline

    Pugs New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I'm not a lawyer and don't play one on TV... but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express... just not last night...

    My understanding is that .jpg files are actually frowned upon in court due to the possiblity of photo-manipulation, but RAW files are more generally accepted in court because you can't manipulate them. Kind of the same reason why negatives were preferred over prints in the film days... I may be talking out of my a$$, though...

    This is the advice that I would give for your situation. I would add, though, that in the long run, you'll be happier shooting RAW and getting some sort of editing software.
  12. Dominantly
    Offline

    Dominantly New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,034
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA (RB)
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +163 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I'll add more for you to think about....... Color space- sRGB or Adobe RGB........ ;)
  13. Rockford
    Offline

    Rockford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sunshine Sate
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Lets take this to the next step ,which would be dedicated processing software

    Which one and why
  14. boomer
    Offline

    boomer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Peoria, AZ
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +51 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    I still shoot in JPEG quite a bit. If its something important, then I'll shoot in RAW+JPEG just to be safe then possibly delete what files i don't want. Just remember, RAW has a lot more capabilities when it comes to editing (White balance and exposure adjustments are my most common reasons from shooting RAW).

    I use Light Room 2.2 and CS2.
  15. Pugs
    Offline

    Pugs New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Lightroom. Hands down. If you can have only software package, that's what I'd choose with no question. It's cataloging, workflow, rating, and organizing features are INCREDIBLE. Plus, with 80-90% of the pics that I need to edit, I don't need to jump into Photoshop at all.

Share This Page