fjrabon
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,644
- Reaction score
- 754
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
The T fixed the vast majority of the "quirks" in the 100. The image quality of the Coolpix is slightly below a D7000 with a good lens. And the X100T blows away the D7000 with a good lens in image quality.Had been wanting a smaller camera to carry most days. After reading a lot of reviews. This is it. I particularly like the manual focus override. Also the macro setting. Adorama is closed but my order is in. Sunday when they open shop, will call and ask about rewards points application.
I use to have the Fuji X100 and I liked it, but the camera had too many quirks in my opinion, just things I didn't like but it was one heck of a nice looking camera and not cheap either. But i'd say for price of the Coolpix A, it gives the X100s/t a run for its money.
All that being said, the Coolpix is ~$1000 less than an X100T, so it's okay that the X100T beats it soundly, the Coolpix is still an incredible value at these prices. I came close to buying a coolpix when they were at $500 and if I had any need for one now, I'd absolutely jump at this deal.
A camera that the Coolpix could probably stand up to would be the LX100, though I'd still take the LX100 (but again, the Coolpix is ~$440 cheaper) if this was my only compact, due to the lack of versatility of the 28mm.
For me the 28mm is both a pro and a con. A con in that I think it's a fairly non-versatile length, a pro in that if I already have a 35mm, it might serve as a second, pocketable street shooter. It's actually about the same price as Fuji's X100 wide angle conversion lens anyway. I think I may have just talked myself into buying one.