Should I stick with Olympus?

Discussion in 'Photography Beginners' Forum' started by IDLaxStar, Sep 3, 2010.

  1. IDLaxStar

    IDLaxStar TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Idaho
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    So my uncle bought me my Olympus E-410 dslr a couple years back. Its was great and all for the first two years that I had it. Then my parents bought me a 70-300mm f/5.6 zoom lens for our cruise to Alaska. Then that keep me entertained. But this camera just can't do everything I want it to now. I want to get into sports photography and this thing can't give me good pictures once the sun starts to go down. I also want to get into macro photography too. So I was thinking about buying a macro lens. But then I thought about it and maybe I should stop buying Olympus stuff. Because I know I can upgrade to a better Olympus camera but would it just be better in the long run to buy a middle of the road Cannon or Nikon body. Because I don't want to keep buying Olympus equipment if I will be switching over to Cannon or Nikon later. What are your guys opinions.
     
  2. Don Kondra

    Don Kondra Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    531
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    It really depends on whether or not you think some day you want to upgrade to a "professional" level camera.

    Bodies come and go but lens are the real investment. Right now you're shooting with an older low end consumer camera and Standard Grade lenses.

    I've got a pretty good selection of Zuiko lens and about eight months ago had to decide whether to sell and move to a Nikon D300. I decided to purchase the E-30 ($1000) and just recently purchased a used E-3 ($650).

    I'm happy with my decision...

    YMMV.

    BTW > I have two E-510 bodies for sale :)

    Cheers, Don
     
  3. IDLaxStar

    IDLaxStar TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Idaho
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Do you get good results with your E-30? Is the E-30 better then the average Nikon or Cannon Body?
     
  4. Don Kondra

    Don Kondra Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    531
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Oh boy, you need to do some research :)

    Both companies make dslr models ranging from consumer up to pro level. Meaning from ~$500 to ~$8000.

    Course you can also consider a Leica @ $27,000 or a Hasselblad @ $42,000 <roar>

    When you're deciding what brand to buy you should at least compare models on the same PRICE level.

    Under "Buying Guide" at Digital Cameras: Digital Photography Review, News, Reviews, Forums, FAQ you can compare models side by each :)

    But that's only part of the research, look at the LENSES. That's more important than a body.

    As for results, you tell me. Click on my gallery under my avatar. Most of the images where shot with the E-510 which cost ~$600 two and a half years ago. The lenses used are all High Grade.

    Cheers, Don
     
  5. IDLaxStar

    IDLaxStar TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Idaho
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Well I have looked at prices and specs. I was just wanting some insight on in the long run should i switch over to nikon or cannon or will a top of the line olympus do everything i need it to?
     
  6. Don Kondra

    Don Kondra Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    531
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Short answer, Yes :)

    Generally speaking, any of the top brands in the same price range using lenses in the same price range will produce similar results.

    Depending on who's pushing the buttons :)

    As to whether or not to "stick" with Olympus, right now you haven't got anything keeping you back. You'd be lucky to get $100 for your body and the 70-300, which is a great standard grade lens, is selling used for a little over $200.

    Again, how much do you want to spend ?

    Cheers, Don
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2010
  7. usayit

    usayit No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,523
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The advantages to switching systems is often nominal... The real advantage comes with glass.

    You should do your research from the aspect of which glass out there (any brand) will enable you to shoot what you want. At that time, you can decide which system best supports that glass.

    Do realize that sports photography is probably the most demanding type of photography on equipment. You'll definitely need money to support fast telephotos. It doesn't matter which system you use.

    Also realize that what is important for Macro photos is often less the glass and more the lighting. I'm pretty positive that Olympus makes macro lenses for their systems.
     
  8. Don Kondra

    Don Kondra Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    531
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    For sports I would recommend a used E-3, going for $6-750 used.

    A 50-200mm f2.8/3.5 used for ~$800. The ec20, a 2x teleconvertor is ~$500 but you lose two stops of light.

    The next level is going to hurt, the 90-250mm f2.8 for $6000. Or the 300mm f2.8 for $7000.

    Cheers, Don
     
  9. Don Kondra

    Don Kondra Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    531
    Location:
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Also for sports you are going to want to consider the "reach" of the lenses.

    Olympus has a crop factor of two meaning a 200mm lens has the effective field of view of 400mm.

    Nikon and Canon have 1.5 and 1.6 crop factors.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2010
  10. SageMark

    SageMark TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Covington
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Note to buyer: 1/3 of your budget on the body, 2/3 on glass. 80% of what you want to do, is in the importance of your glass, whereas only 20% lies in your body. Obviously, I agree with Don Kondra, bodies come and go, and glass is the investment.
     
  11. SageMark

    SageMark TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Covington
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    If you want middle of the raod, and something for action,...I have the perfect camera for you. A Nikon D2h, in great condition.
     
  12. IDLaxStar

    IDLaxStar TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Idaho
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Ok, so if i buy a olympus body in the same price range as a nikon or cannon i will be getting the same quality. But like you guys said lens are really what matters. So does olympus have all the same quality of lens also, and are they the same price or more or less? Also Sagemark how much for the 2dh
     

Share This Page