HASHASHIN
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
- Messages
- 414
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- NYC
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
that a 40 dollar UV filter isn't necessary.
Though I imagine the price can be attributed to the huge 72mm thread of that lens.
None of my lenses get UV filters, just lens caps and hoods where possible.
Really just personal preference though, I can fully understand the want to protect the element of a 450+ dollar lens. For me, I dont have anything priced like that so no UV's for me.
i know its just personal preference...
im just saying..if it is your preference to protect your expensive glass...40 dollars isnt out of the question..its even a bit on the inexpensive side
i dont use one for my 70 dollar 50 mm...because if the glass gets damaged...ill just buy a new one....on the other hand....i wouldnt let my macro lens out of the bag without one...getting a scratch just isnt worth it to me...and when my 70-200 comes in the mail...ill def. be spending a bit on one to protect it as well..and im guessing a b+w filter for the 77mm thread will be around 70 bucks..
i just dont like the snarky way max bloom comes with alot of his responses...i was just wondering what he was trying to get at with his snide remark