Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I got my 80-200 from a local Craiglist guy for $600.
Note it's really soft at 2.8, which is expected even for a quality lens like this.
This is the AF-D, correct? Some say that the 80-200 AF-S is much sharper wide open.
It would be interesting to see a comparison.
This is like comparing a honda civic (good car, good built, last a long time) to a Rolls Royce (work of art, amazing built, expensive). the nikon being the Rolls of course!!!
The Nikon of course. By the numbers its optics performs better than the Sigma's, plus it will hold its resale value better. And after reading this thread here, I'd be hard pressed to even consider the Sigma.
Gee I wonder if the OP really cares since his last post was over a year ago and this thread is from 2009. :lmao: