situation: a photographer visits a car show. said photographer takes an image of a car at the show. photgrapher then starts selling prints of the image. owner of the car, sees the pictures and gets a bee in the bonnet. car owner demands monitary recompense for the 'usage' of the afformentioned vehicle in the images. where do the photgrapher and car owner stand in a situation like this? am i correct in assuming that since the car was at a public show, the owner has no legal right to any proceeds for the sale of the artwork?