Sony to stop producing DSLR?

Discussion in 'Sony' started by erotavlas, Feb 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. erotavlas
    Offline

    erotavlas Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    sonyalpharumors | Blog | (SR4) UPDATED: There is no A600, and there will be no DSLR camera anymore...

    "According to that source the A600 rumor is fake and he goes also one step further saying that there is no plan within Sony to make a DSLR camera in future. This can of course change, but in the short and mid term you should not expect any new optical viewfinder in any Sony camera."

    If the rumor is true I'm not surprised, the classic DSLR design is on its way out.
  2. Overread
    Offline

    Overread has a hat around here somewhere Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    20,954
    Likes Received:
    3,063
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    UK - England
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +3,137 / 1
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    To be quite frank most camera rumours are not worth the type used to print them on the net. Canon Rumours has had "confirmed" rumours of things like a 100-400mm MII and a 24-70mm MII (often with IS) for years now - they've only just got the last one half right! In general most camera and most big companies don't have regular reliable leeks of info onto random blog sites. It generally does not happen and most rumour isn't worth paying too much attention too.

    As for the whole "DSLRs are on the way out" I highly doubt this. Mirrorless have a long way to go before video input can equal or beat a mirror box (and be fitted economically inside a DSLR body).
  3. cosmonaut
    Offline

    cosmonaut New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    North Georgia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +98 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I agree there is just to big of a market for DSLRs, there are to many pros that will settle for nothing less. I think you will see less consumer based ones. I just don't see pros shooting pro sports with an a77. I just wasn't made for that.
  4. usayit
    Offline

    usayit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,503
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    North New Jersey, United States of America
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +342 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    The same rumor exists for Olympus DSLRs.... especially since micro 4 3 systems have gained so much presence in other markets.

    I personally like the micro 4 3, but have little interest in olympus DSLRs.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. skieur
    Offline

    skieur New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    No, they do not have a long way to go in video, they are already there with A77 and will surpass that with the A99. The DSLR mirror is starting to limit further development in terms of size, speed, less noise, less vibration, etc. The fact that it is a mechanical system in an electronic digital camera means that potential for obsolescence is quite high.

    Sony made lead in that direction but if the marketplace reacts positively, then Nikon and Canon will follow suit, like they have done in the past.

    skieur
  6. gsgary
    Offline

    gsgary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    13,556
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Chesterfield UK
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,211 / 8
    My Photos Are OK to Edit

    Canon tried it and it was crap, last week i did a studio night and the only Sony user could not see the subject :lol: through his wonderful veiwfinder
    • Like Like x 2
  7. cgipson1
    Offline

    cgipson1 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    17,146
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,356 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I have seen that too.. a Sony user on a night walk was complaining that he couldn't see some subjects, and was asking some of us to hold flashlights so he could try to get some shots. lol! I suggested he get a Nikon!
    • Like Like x 1
  8. o hey tyler
    Offline

    o hey tyler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    9,744
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    I wasn't born in your seven days
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,701 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Canon invented the pellicle mirror several years ago. Who's following who now?
  9. Nikon_Josh
    Offline

    Nikon_Josh New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    95
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Surrey, UK
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +95 / 0
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Soo now your claiming that Nikon and Canon have copied Sony in the past? Get a grip of yourself, Man! The new D4 is a copy is it? I don't know why your posts always have to go the route of downhill skiing.
  10. kassad
    Offline

    kassad New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NE Wisconsin USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    Yes the D4 is a copy of a Sony camera that is exactly what he's saying. Come on don't be ridculous. Why do you guy keep baiting these trolls? As ridculous as Skiuer and Argy get, you and O Hey Tyler are getting just as disruptive.
  11. Derrel
    Offline

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    29,606
    Likes Received:
    10,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +10,721 / 2
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Actually, I believe it was Nikon that introduced the FIRST pellicle-mirror-equipped SLR camera. Canon did produce a pellicle-mirrored SLR about two decades later, and they made ONE production run of it. Those EOS film cameras lingered on dealer shelves for eight or nine years. Meaning the model was a horrifically poor seller, and Canon EOS customers did not see any upside to the camera. The earlier Nikon pellicle mirror model was basically a way to get 2 more FPS out of a 1970's era F2 body. The Montreal Olympics,in 1976, keeps popping into my mind...

    Canon and Nikon have figured out how to make counter-balancing and vibration-reducing mechanisms that tremendously lessen the forces of the mirror raising and lowering...it's one of the reasons both Canon and Nikon can make cameras that will fire at 8,9,10 frames per second, with virtually no ill effects. I suspect that the camera makers might have been inspired by the Japanese fishing and bicycle gear-maker SHIMANO, and their Dyna-Balance system, which turned the high-speed rotating motion and up and down oscillating motion of spinning reels from a wobbly, feel-killing mess, into a smooth, almost perfect balance and cancellation of opposing forces of the spool rising and lowering and the encircling rotor's rotating...when Dyna-Balance was invented, it revolutionized the fishing reel industry. That was in 1990 as I recall.

    Never underestimate the mechanical engineering prowess of the Japanese camera designers. The pellicle mirror has been measured, and found wanting. Multiple times. Sony is using it to mace a lower-cost camera body that needs no mirror balancing system,and as a way to get to high firing rates, as a way to lure prosumers to their brand.
  12. kassad
    Offline

    kassad New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NE Wisconsin USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit

    I would be suprised if this rumor isn't true. While I don't think DSLR is going away anytime soon on higher end bodies, I think mirrorless designs will continue to eat into the market share of lower end dslrs. I'm not sure how well Sony's SLTs will fair in the long run but I suspect the Sony Nex 7 might be a glimpse forward.
  13. o hey tyler
    Offline

    o hey tyler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    9,744
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    I wasn't born in your seven days
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,701 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    From Wikipedia:



    Further along in the article...



    and Nikon comes in...



    Here is the provided list of cameras:


    • Canon
      • Pellix QL (1965)
      • F-1 High Speed (LE for the 1972 Olympics)
      • EOS RT (1989)
      • EOS 1N RS (1994)
    • Nikon
      • F2 HS
      • F3 HS (Introduced for the 1998 Nagano Olympics)
    Perhaps you know of an additional Nikon that wasn't mentioned in the article. After all it IS Wikipedia...
  14. DiskoJoe
    Offline

    DiskoJoe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,548
    Likes Received:
    526
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Houston
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +526 / 0
    My Photos Are NOT OK to Edit
    I doubt sony go to only making mirrorless cameras. Sony is an electronics producer and will keep producing dslr's as long as they sell. They may be trying to get a bigger piece of the mirrorless and 4/3 markets but it would be stupid for a billion dollar company to completely abandon the whole dslr market. Even if they dont lead the market they are still getting a pretty nice piece of it.
  15. Derrel
    Offline

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    29,606
    Likes Received:
    10,297
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +10,721 / 2
    My Photos Are OK to Edit
    Oh, sorry, my mistake!!!! The Canon Pellix...yes...that was the first production 35mm pellicle mirror SLR, and the thing never took off. Now that you mention the Pellix, I remember some on-line accounts of Pellix users. The Pellix lasted for one year, then was replaced by the Pellix QL, which had the Canon "Quick Load" system,designed to appeal to those were not confident in their ability to load a regular 35mm camera by putting a leader into a slit in a take-up spool. It is hard to appreciate it now, but Canon's 1960's cameras were largely kind of junky. Many of the Pellix bodies broke down well before their time,from what I have heard.

    The Pellix had no option for a motor drive nor for a winder.

    Like Sony today, Canon was just a mid-line SLR camera maker in 1965, stuck in the pack with Pentax and Minolta and Petri,and that ilk of camera makers. It's hard to over-state how far they have come since the Pellix days. But yes, they did make the "Pellix", which was not very popular, nor successful. I'm not saying this to be hostile toward Canon, but in 1965, Canon as a camera maker was a lot like SONY--trying to take on a market with bigger and better-selling and just "better" competitors with better models. It's not surprising that Canon tried something that was radically new, and different, but which was not really destined to succeed. Heck, I had forgotten about the Pellix...it was kind of like that movie with Afflec and Jolie...basically stillborn. Canon introduced the QL or Quick Load system in 1966...as a way to try and get end-users to believe they could load their fancy 35mm SLR cameras. I think SONY is trying some of the same methods, as a "new maker", to try and stimulate sales.

    Nikon had a high-speed 7 frames per second camera at the 1972, Sapporo, Japan Olympics. It was called the Nikon F HighSpeed Sapporo, but it had a mirror that was locked up, and then an accessory finder was used.

    Then, in 1974, Nikon produced a limited run of another F variant, The Nikon F HighSpeed Montreal, which went to 9 frames per second. THIS model is the one used later, in 1976, at the Montreal Olympics.

    There were also 7 Nikon F Motor Pellicle cameras used at the 1976 Montreal Olympics.

    The Nikon F2 HighSpeed Model 1, was introduced at Photkina 1978, and NOT in 1976, which Wikipedia wrongly states.

    There was also a Nikon F2 HighSpeed Model II, not mentioned by Wikipedia.

    The Complete Nikon System, by Peter Braczko, is where this information came from.

    Canon and Nikon's pellicle mirror cameras were all basically technical marvels--but they never really DID ANYTHING great, sales-wise. Sony latching on to the decades-old, failed camera making ideas of the past...where will it lead Sony? One of the things research shows is that the mirrorless camera sales in JAPAN were pretty good last year, but in the USA were not so good. DPreview has a good article on sales of mirrorless cameras, posted a day or two ago. SONY might want to try and sew up the mirrorless market, before Canon's missing mirrorless model hits the streets. SOny bailing on the d-slr market??? I suppose they could. They have consumer electronics and video games to bail themselves out.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

2013 discontinue making dslr

,

did sony discontinue their dslr line

,
discontinued sony dslr cameras
,
making a sony 35mm camera into a dslr
,

sony dslr cameras how long have they made them

,

sony dslr market

,

sony not making dslr

,

sony to stop making cameras

,
stop making dslr's?
,

which sony cameras are they going to stop making