tamron 17-50 2.8

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by photogincollege, Dec 2, 2007.

  1. photogincollege

    photogincollege TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, Michigan.
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    hey everyone i hear this is a very good lens for the price does anyone know of any problems with it. Also how sharp is it? sorry for all the lens questions just trying to narrow it down a bit so when i go to the store i have lenses in mind to look at.
     
  2. Deadeye008

    Deadeye008 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I bought this lens a few months ago and enjoy it very much. I have not had any problems with it at all and it is on my camera 90% of the time. The AF is a little noisy but fairly fast and accurate. I haven't done any sharpness tests myself. Here is a review that shows image quality of the lens.
    http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/tamron_17-50_review.html
     
  3. Garbz

    Garbz No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    203
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
  4. JerryPH

    JerryPH No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Montreal, QC, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    It also has a tendancy for the front element to come loose. There are 3 screws inside that for some reason are not properly scured by Tamron.

    If one has the ability, you can take those 3 screws off, add a TOUCH of loctite, replace them and never worry.

    Or you could get the Sigma 18-50 HSM which has less CA, less vignetting and is sharper than the Tamron or the Nikkor equivalent and has a 3:1 macro thrown in for good measure.

    The September 2007 issue of Professional Photographer has an article that has a shoot out between these lenses... the Sigma won, but only by a hair. This was enough for me to purchase it. I am VERY happy with it.
     
  5. Big Mike

    Big Mike I am Big, I am Mike Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    33,822
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Location:
    Edmonton
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I've got the Tamron. It's a pretty good lens; it seem well built (I've never heard of the loose screw problem) and the images are quite sharp.

    The AF is a little more noisy that a nice Canon 'USM' lens...but it's has never been a problem for me.
     
  6. Deadeye008

    Deadeye008 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    The HSM is only available on the Nikon mount with this lens.
    Photozone prefers the Tamron... http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/sigma_1850_28m_nikon/index.htm
     
  7. S2K1

    S2K1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    I have this lens and it's the one I use the most. I really like it, there are better lenses out there for sure, but the price:quality ratio is very good.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
sigma 17-50 2.8 compared to tamron 17-50 2.8
,

sigma 17-50 or tamron 17-50

,
sigma 17-50 tamron 17-50
,
sigma 17-50 vs tamron 17-50
,
tamron 17-50 loose front element