So, I'm in the market for a new wide angle. I want to replace the sigma I've been using. It's not bad, but it's not a nikon and it has it's flaws. So I'm trying to decide between the $1500 AF-S Zoom-NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED and the $1600 AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED. I'm having trouble finding sample images for both which is making it more difficult to decide. NikonUSA claims that the 17-35 is the standard for photojournalism(which is what I do for a living) and I like the 35mm max, but I also like the 14mm end of things of the 14-24 and on paper it seems to have better optical capabilities. Anybody have some experience or shots with either? It would be much appreciated. Oh, and it's for a D300.