IanK
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2008
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I shot at the track for the first time this season yesterday it was also the first time with my D90 and 70-300MM nikkor lens. To say the least the lens is terrible HaHa I knew this already but I really didn't realize how bad it was. It focus's so slow and dumbfounded on fast moving objects its almost not worth even having. Luckily my friend had his 70-200 2.8 Nikkor with him and i had access to that all day, which is fantastic and really dominates for sports photography. So I have to replace this lens very soon, but the Nikkor 2.8 is INSANELY expensive and just not going to happen at this point, so my question is does anyone use sigmas/tamrons version of the 70-200 for there sports photos ? if so how do you like it, how comparable to nikons 70-200 2.8 is it, and is it worth the price over cheap nikon lens's like the 18-200 or 70-300 4-5.6 ? I have never used anything other than nikkor lens's any insight is appreciated.
-Ian
PS: Thank god for friends with expensive toys, saved my day
-Ian
PS: Thank god for friends with expensive toys, saved my day