RMThompson
the TPF moderators rock my world!
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,888
- Reaction score
- 11
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You've GOT to be kidding, saying that you disagree with four people on the quality of the first pose. The first pose you posted made her look like a fat, dual-amputated doughball, and was a horrible, amateurish-looking pose. Your second and third shots of the same model shots are vastly better--and yet you want to defend the first pose...after four people in a row stated that the first pose/shot was bad?
The second pose is much better; even though she looks like her skin has been boiled, or she's gotten a nice one-day sunburn, her hips are positioned well in relation to the camera, ie at an angle, her shoulders are pulled back, and her bust is displayed nicely in the second pose. That's called good posture, and it follows reasonable,well-proven posing guidelines for swimwear work. In the first shot, her hips are presented to the camera square-on, her breasts appear to sag down to within four inches of her belly button, and her shoulderds appear slouched and hunched over, and her face appears fat.
And yet you write in reply to all four of us: "I just totally have to disagree with the pose. I don't think it makes her look larger at all, in fact, if anything it emphasizes her curves."
I would love to hear you expound upon, just exactly what it is about the original photo that makes it such a good,complete pose. I'd like to hear why you completely disagree with four consecutive people telling you the original photo is unflattering.
You've GOT to be kidding, saying that you disagree with four people on the quality of the first pose. The first pose you posted made her look like a fat, dual-amputated doughball, and was a horrible, amateurish-looking pose. Your second and third shots of the same model shots are vastly better--and yet you want to defend the first pose...after four people in a row stated that the first pose/shot was bad?
The second pose is much better; even though she looks like her skin has been boiled, or she's gotten a nice one-day sunburn, her hips are positioned well in relation to the camera, ie at an angle, her shoulders are pulled back, and her bust is displayed nicely in the second pose. That's called good posture, and it follows reasonable,well-proven posing guidelines for swimwear work. In the first shot, her hips are presented to the camera square-on, her breasts appear to sag down to within four inches of her belly button, and her shoulderds appear slouched and hunched over, and her face appears fat.
And yet you write in reply to all four of us: "I just totally have to disagree with the pose. I don't think it makes her look larger at all, in fact, if anything it emphasizes her curves."
I would love to hear you expound upon, just exactly what it is about the original photo that makes it such a good,complete pose. I'd like to hear why you completely disagree with four consecutive people telling you the original photo is unflattering.
I agree.
I have a question for you "RmThomspon." Why not use a little spray on tan instead of pp. Your pp skills are awful I'm sorry but it's the truth. You can only grow from C&C even if it's not what you want to hear.