To put or not to put on my website?

Discussion in 'The Professional Gallery' started by look, Oct 26, 2005.

?

Which is better/worth putting as an example of work on website?

  1. Version 1

    57.1%
  2. Version 2

    42.9%
  3. None

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. look

    look TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I like candid / reporter style wedding photography and I am interested in your oppinion if this is woth showing as an example of my work and which version you prefer.

    I am adding a pole to save your time if you are not into discusion :)

    Thank you!


    Version 1

    [​IMG]


    Version 2

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Sharkbait

    Sharkbait TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,405
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    I like the facial sharpness better in #1 (in the second it looks oversharpened), but I like the cleanup of the motion haloes in the second. Also, I'd try a b/w version, as that's just really, really, really red. :D
     
  3. AIRIC

    AIRIC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,801
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    Brooklin, Ontario, Canuckia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I like 1 but without the halo. Neat shot and conversion. I like the colour tone as well, nice and warm.

    Eric
     
  4. clemeys

    clemeys TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    I can't decide which one I like better. Would like to see b/w. Also don't know if I'd put on your website as the other pics I viewd in 5 minutes were less racy for lack of a better word unless that's what you're goin for. Good candid catch!
     

Share This Page