Tree reshoot

[anthonydamario]

Re-shoot:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4011/4300221755_0d5ff62618_b.jpg

Original:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2741/4252341938_feb13c0854_b.jpg

Click links for large. CC appreciated!

 

[TiaS]

I like this alot

 

[Big]

Sorry but I don't see any difference other than one being closer to the tree. What were you trying to accomplish?

 

[anthonydamario]

It's a different angle and the shadow is in the shot.

 

[HikinMike]

Sorry but I don't see any difference other than one being closer to the tree. What were you trying to accomplish?

He didn't crop off the tree top on the original one.

Nice job! :thumbup:

 

[anthonydamario]

Thanks a lot man

 

[Bill19]

I like the first one, but its too close to the frame IMO, move it to the left a bit, and maybe it would make a good mono?

 

[robertwsimpson]

composition of the original with the lighting from the reshoot = win!

 

[Mulewings~]

Good job of going back ... and even better job of showing the before and after.

The reshoot went well.

 

[anthonydamario]

Robert, the lighting is exactly the same in both. Thank you Mulewings

 

[robertwsimpson]

To me, the first one looks like it is lit directly from the right, while the second one looks like it is slightly farther away from the camera shooting at a diagonal... That's why the shadows are different, no?

 

[HikinMike]

Lighting maybe the same, but it looks like you moved locations...look at the shadows....unless you moved the lights.

 

[anthonydamario]

I only moved positions. The lighting is exactly the same because it's like a floodlight on a telephone pole, it just comes on at night for no reason and it lights the tree up quite nicely. All I did was move back and to the right a bit for the second shoot. The original was a 30 second exposure and the other was 25 seconds.