robertwsimpson
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,471
- Reaction score
- 30
- Location
- West Palm Beach, Fl
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40483547@N07/4681750379/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40483547@N07/4682381132/
C&C is welcome... A little back story: This is Jaguar's newest car, which just became available to the public last week. Hope you enjoy!
The only par of the picture standing out is the front fascia of the car
I agree the first image is a good candidate for HDR. How did you make it? Did you use multiple exposures or multiple files of the same exposure?
I think there's a lot more to be had. I've only just started doing HDR in my architectural shots. It's taking me a bit of time, but I think each try brings me closer to what I want.
-Pete
The scene did does not need to be HDR... you could of just used a single exposure.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40483547@N07/4681750379/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40483547@N07/4682381132/
C&C is welcome... A little back story: This is Jaguar's newest car, which just became available to the public last week. Hope you enjoy!
#1 image if you look at the top of that corner you can't deny the halo now don't tell me it's the sky because it's not, It does have some very dark areas.
#2 looks like a standard image, why is the exif data removed on both images?:er:
I don't know what you mean by the second part... what more can be had?
I must say that I dodged the heck out of the signs and the sky.
The only par of the picture standing out is the front fascia of the car
The front fascia of the car is kind of the whole point of the photo, so I guess I did my job!
I agree the first image is a good candidate for HDR. How did you make it? Did you use multiple exposures or multiple files of the same exposure?
I think there's a lot more to be had. I've only just started doing HDR in my architectural shots. It's taking me a bit of time, but I think each try brings me closer to what I want.
-Pete
multiple exposures.
I don't know what you mean by the second part... what more can be had?
Isn't that usually the case? I used HDR to bring out a little more detail in the shadows and highlights.
C&C is welcome... A little back story: This is Jaguar's newest car, which just became available to the public last week. Hope you enjoy!
#1 image if you look at the top of that corner you can't deny the halo now don't tell me it's the sky because it's not, It does have some very dark areas.
#2 looks like a standard image, why is the exif data removed on both images?:er:
#1, I don't understand what you're talking about. I don't see any halo in that photo.
#2, I am glad it looks like a standard image. That means I'm doing it correctly. I am guessing that the exif data is removed because of photomatix. That is the program that I use to create the HDR image.
I must say that I dodged the heck out of the signs and the sky.
Hmmm....
Now remember, I'm new to this too.
Did you dodge or burn the sky and signs?
But why would you have to do either with an HDR image? Help me understand.
-Pete
The only par of the picture standing out is the front fascia of the car
The front fascia of the car is kind of the whole point of the photo, so I guess I did my job!
multiple exposures.
I don't know what you mean by the second part... what more can be had?
Isn't that usually the case? I used HDR to bring out a little more detail in the shadows and highlights.
#1 image if you look at the top of that corner you can't deny the halo now don't tell me it's the sky because it's not, It does have some very dark areas.
#2 looks like a standard image, why is the exif data removed on both images?:er:
#1, I don't understand what you're talking about. I don't see any halo in that photo.
#2, I am glad it looks like a standard image. That means I'm doing it correctly. I am guessing that the exif data is removed because of photomatix. That is the program that I use to create the HDR image.
All I did was invert the image to show you the halo don't know about you
but on my monitor I can clearly see the halo, and no my monitor is just fine.
I know you were going for that natural look hell I must have hundreds of standard hdr images then that have been done so well. Don't gas up your head bro how you expect people to respect you if youre going to criticize peoples work but when youre own image is criticize you treat as perfection I cant respect that there is nothing indicating in the #2nd indicating HDR on it. You can disagree all you want to but you asked for critique so I gave it.