what size UV filter for zoom lens?

Discussion in 'Photography Beginners' Forum' started by DScience, Apr 17, 2009.

  1. DScience
    Offline

    DScience New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0
    I'm wondering what size UV filters I would get for the two lenses I have:

    18-55 mm AF-S VR
    55-200 mm AF-S VR

    Why I am asking, is because when I search places for UV filters, they sell them by the different sizes.

    Thanks!
  2. turnbeaugh5
    Offline

    turnbeaugh5 New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Both of those lenses take a 52 mm. filter.
  3. Dao
    Offline

    Dao Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    5,970
    Likes Received:
    350
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +350 / 0
    Or take a look at the from of the lenses, they usually have the size printed on them.
  4. DScience
    Offline

    DScience New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0
    Thanks!

    This is probably really stupid, but does the filter go on the front of the lens? or between the lens and the camera body?
  5. turnbeaugh5
    Offline

    turnbeaugh5 New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    It screws on to the front of the lens.
  6. Sherman Banks
    Offline

    Sherman Banks New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Rain City
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    My quantarary from Ritz is pretty clear and I got it with a Circular polarizer for around $30. Your lens cap will attach to both as well, and you can stack the filters but you will see some vignetting at your lowest focal length if you do so. Both have been a good investment although I know people spend wayy more on these kinds of things.
  7. Dao
    Offline

    Dao Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    5,970
    Likes Received:
    350
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +350 / 0
    Most of them are screw on. But some of them are not such as the Colkin filter system
  8. kundalini
    Offline

    kundalini Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    13,421
    Likes Received:
    1,845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    State of Confusion
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1,847 / 0
    Typically yes, but there are lenses that have drop in filters on the rear element. Usually these are high end super telephotos (300mm f/2.8 and longer) and the Cokin style filters.
  9. DScience
    Offline

    DScience New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0
    Thank you so much ! I swear this is the best forum I have every been a part of!

    Sherman, thanks again for the wonderful help!
  10. KmH
    Offline

    KmH Helping photographers learn to fish

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    34,033
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,063 / 0
    Don't waste your money. All you need is the lens cap, the hood and good camera/lens handeling habits to avoid damage to the objective glass of your lenses.

    Lens engineers go to great lengths to minimise the number of air gaps and pieces of glass in a lens.

    Adding a UV filter undermines both, adding glass and an air gap. Both your lenses will be more suseptable to lens flare and there will be a measure of image quality degradation depending on which brand of UV filter you chose. Considering those are both kit lenses and not top of the line glass I'd seriously reconsider adding UV filters from the IQ aspects alone.

    You may also want to consider: If your UV filter should shatter (and they are very thin compared to the objective of your lens), all those shards become sharp objects that can scratch and damage the glass they are supposed to be protecting.

    If you feel you must put something in front of the objective glass get 52mm clears (not UV) from Nikon or B+W.
  11. EhJsNe
    Offline

    EhJsNe New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    614
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    A Riverside Town by Canada
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0
    +1 on everthing KmH said.

    A UV filter can degrade image quality and add ugly flare to your images.

    I dont use UV filters because I feel anything thats powerfull enough to break my front element is strong enough to break a very thin peice of glass and scratch up your front element.

    I prefer a lens hood (I have built in lens hoods on my most used lenses) because it provides protection from real dangers, like hitting a wall or (if using a non built in hood) if you drop it element first on the ground.

    And hoods dont break if you hit them, and are not too much more than filters. So youll never have to replace it!

    and its a 52mm, if you still want a UV filter.
  12. dcclark
    Offline

    dcclark New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Houghton, MI
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    I think that the "UV filters will only cause problems" folks are being a bit too general.

    My trusty UV filters have saved my butt more than once. But then again, I am usually shooting in situations where it's extremely difficult to keep the camera perfectly safe at all times -- usually bushwhacking it, climbing, standing on slippery rocks, etc. No matter how good your camera handling is, you WILL screw up -- and I've been very glad to have UV filters on those occasions.

    But, for more "normal" situations, you probably should listen to KmH. But know what you are going to do, and decide as appropriate.
  13. bdavison
    Offline

    bdavison New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Yeah, you say that till you prang the end of the lens and cant unscrew that filter. I hate the things. Ill use a polarizer occasionally, but other than that...lens hoods only.

    There's only one time Id use a UV filter, and thats wet environments when I dont want salt water, etc on my front element. Let it chew up a cheap UV filter instead...LOL

Share This Page