What's the difference between cutting off limbs and framing?

Senor Hound

TPF Noob!
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
0
Location
La la land...
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Okay, so I have heard when photographing someone to not "cut off" their limbs (i.e. hands and feet). But, I was looking at a magazine cover that cut a model off at the mid thigh level. This got me thinking...

There are tons of shots there that don't show a person's whole body, yet this rule of cutting people's limbs off still applies. As far as composure, how can you tell when you're cutting limbs off, or simply getting in tight on the subject? For example, my avatar shows me with my head on my hands, but my elbows are cut out. I know this is a no-no, yet how am I supposed to get a close shot without cutting off my elbows?

Does this make any sense? I know there's some ideas or "rules" to follow for this, but right now, I can't tell when I'm going to be cutting off limbs and making a crummy shot or when I'm just zooming in close and getting a great shot.
 
The rule I've heard is "don't cut people off at their joints", which I find practical and reasonable.
 
just look at the image and ask yourself if it looks something is missing. If not, then it is OK.
 
The key point, as mentioned is to not amputate at the joints... lol

Mid-arm or leg looks a lot more natural and looks as if it is done on purpose. Knees and elbows are the key areas to avoid cropping.
 
"Don't cut off limbs" isn't a rule, it is a goal.
Goals aren't always achievable.
 
"Don't cut off limbs" isn't a rule, it is a goal.
Goals aren't always achievable.

... and rules are made to be broken. :lol:

The point of it all is just don't make your subject look like an amputee when they aren't (and even better, when they *are*).
 
as stated, its not dont cut off limb, its dont cut at the joint.. so you have an arm... you need to crop... do you crop at the wrist??? no... elbow?? no... how about forarm.. BINGO... it really does make a difference i've noticed... my sister took some pics of my wife and i for us and there were a few where she framed it at the knee or elbow, and they look bad
 
There are three types of portraits. Full length, half and bust. Full length is all (most) of the body. If you have the LOWER legs you should have the feet and try not to ptograph the soles of the feet unless it lends to the overall appearance of the photograph and its presentation. Half is basically from the waist up and should include the arms. Bust is upper chest and face.

But yes, rules are made to be broken. AMEN.
 
One is an incredibly painful procedure preferably done by a trained surgeon, and the other involves taking a picture and putting a border around it.

Ok in seriousness, cutting off limbs isn't what it sounds like. When people say this we're talking about full body shots with toes missing, or someone taking a 3/4 or 1/2 body shot and the hand is missing from one arm.
 
So did I do an okay job in my avatar? Here's a full shot

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3058/2493629119_87585e8f40_o.jpg

I know this isn't the part for criticism, but I still don't quite get it. I cut the shot off at the arm/forearm, but my arms come back in to the photo, so I don't know if this would be considered cutting off limbs or not.
 
Rules are good as a starting point.
Many times, bending the rule looks better. Many times, there's
more than one good cropping.

This, I think, sums it up pretty well –
"just look at the image and ask yourself if it looks something is
missing. If not, then it is OK." [Alex_B]

IMO, your crop looks fine.
 
Ok in seriousness, cutting off limbs isn't what it sounds like. When people say this we're talking about full body shots with toes missing, or someone taking a 3/4 or 1/2 body shot and the hand is missing from one arm.
That's how I've always understood it. Also, "cutting off limbs" is something that happens by accident, framing is intentional.
 
looks good to me
 

Most reactions

Back
Top