Why such High ISO?

Discussion in 'Beyond the Basics' started by Patriot, Jan 8, 2013.

  1. Patriot
    Offline

    Patriot New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +91 / 0
    Why are companies pushing for such high ISO numbers? At what point would someone really use ISO 25,600? It seem so pointless to go so high as IQ will drop because of it. Is it just bragging rights at who can produce the better sensor? It seems the same as shutter speed, I can't think of when someone would use a shutter speed of 1/8000th. If you taking pictures at night why not just use a tripod and slow the shutter to let in more light? Heck you could use ISO 100 if you leave the shutter open long enough right?

    In my opinion they should focus that R&D funds to developing better optics(which can always get better) or focusing better in low light. How about making a hybrid split screen for better manual focusing and fast auto focusing. Those things are really good at manual focusing. I'm sure it could be done if they stop worrying about such ISO numbers and focus that energy else where.


    I'm not saying that it's useless because I'm sure some people use it. Can someone explain this to me because I can't think of a good reason so far? Or could some show me a picture at which they had to push the ISO that high?

    -Hunt
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Judobreaker
    Offline

    Judobreaker TPF Supporters

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    225
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Holland
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +226 / 0
    I'm guessing that with higher ISO capabilities the lower ISO numbers also improve, so the number might actually tell you something about general ISO performance.
    I'm not sure, but it's what I'd guess.
  3. bratkinson
    Offline

    bratkinson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    238
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Western MA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +241 / 0
    Why such high ISO? Low light, plain and simple.

    This past Sunday evening at an event at church, I wanted to keep my aperture in the 5.6-8 range for depth of field considerations, and shutter speeds faster than 125 due to shooting people with my 24-105 f4L and 16-35 f2.8L lenses, no flash. To get proper exposure out of that, it was ISO 5000 on my 5D3. But, when shooting wide open with the 135 f2L (for razor thin DOF), I simply lowered the ISO to 1600 and kept the shutter speed the same.

    Bottom line, without the higher ISO, I would have been forced to shoot at shutter speeds 1/30-1/60 range, maybe lower, and 80-90% of the shots would be blurred due to subject and my movement.
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2013
    • Like Like x 1
  4. SCraig
    Offline

    SCraig Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,747
    Likes Received:
    2,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,058 / 0
    Yes, but noise would increase. Longer exposures mean electrical current flowing through the sensor for a longer period of time which means more heat is generated within the sensor, and that is one source of noise. Additionally, if you use High ISO Noise Reduction that amount of time is doubled since the camera records an image at the same exposure time but with the shutter closed as a noise reference image.
    • Like Like x 2
  5. 480sparky
    Online

    480sparky Chief Free Electron Relocator

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,917
    Likes Received:
    5,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +5,213 / 0
    I, for one, would love to see single-digit ISOs in a DSLR.
    • Like Like x 4
  6. Patriot
    Offline

    Patriot New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +91 / 0
    Could that even be possible? You could point that at the Sun and still be exposed right(probably). Sensor tech would have to come a long for that to happen right? I don't even know the lowest ISO right now. Is it 25 right?
  7. snowbear
    Offline

    snowbear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,316
    Likes Received:
    758
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Southern Maryland
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +768 / 0
    Marketing - ISO is the new megapixel! :sexywink:
    • Like Like x 4
  8. Garbz
    Offline

    Garbz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,712
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +202 / 0
    The trade off in sensitivity vs shutter speed ALWAYS favours shutterspeed. If you CAN shoot 10 seconds at ISO100 then do. You're taking a worse picture for 5seconds at ISO200, or 2.5 at ISO400 etc.

    Quality. Quantum efficiency is absolute key. It is the secret to high bit depth and great signal to noise ratio at any ISO. The better the numbers the better the image quality. The SIDE-EFFECT of my camera being able to pull incredible detail out of the shadows at ISO100 is that I get a usable picture at ISO25600. The better the efficiency and SNR of the sensor, the better the quality, and ultimately the higher the ISO will go before the picture becomes unacceptably poor.

    All the time for some people. I take it you don't shoot much indoors, or don't try and take photos of people in dim light without the flexibility to use a flash or the ability to use a tripod? This is something wedding photographers in churches have for a long time found really limiting.

    The image quality at ISO25600 is no worse on todays cameras than the image quality of ISO1600 of cameras 5 years ago. This also brings up the question of would you rather have a noisy picture or no picture at all?

    There is a whole field where 1/8000th of a second isn't fast enough. High speed photography. Actually this is a field where people find the minimum flash duration of 1/100000th second limiting too. And while we're talking about this to keep flash duration really short you need to shoot only small amounts of light which becomes much more useful if you have a camera capable of a high ISO :)

    If you have the ability you'd be mad not to. However the world won't stand still for 10 seconds. Sometimes it's appropriate to go for quality and motionblur can be damned, sometimes you're trying to catch some action and a long shutter speed / tripod isn't an option.

    Optics are very limited by the laws of physics. There's very little in the way of better optics these days. The only R&D that could be spent is making quality optics cheaper or making cheaper VR units. Nothing has changed in optics since the invention of aspherical elements some 40 years ago. As for better focusing, focusing is achieved through better sensitivity of the sensor at the bottom of the camera that does phase detection. This is directly linked to the research in higher ISOs for cameras. Autofocus already works better than human eyesight and split prisms so this is a dead end, actually using liveview with higher sensitivity to manually focus in really dark environments would be an idea in my opinion. Actually the only thing I really think has been a waste of time so far is the research in video on DSLRs.

    The following was taken on a D800 for 20seconds at ISO Hi+0.7 (Effectively ISO10000). 20 seconds was the maximum shutterspeed that didn't introduce startrails. ISO10000 was the lowest ISO that gave the required brightness. I have heaps of wedding photos from inside churches shot handheld at some stupid ISOs because there was no other option, but none online. I can post some if you want some example shots.

    [​IMG]
    • Like Like x 14
  9. Patriot
    Offline

    Patriot New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +91 / 0
    You just destroyed me.
    • Like Like x 4
  10. SCraig
    Offline

    SCraig Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,747
    Likes Received:
    2,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +2,058 / 0
    Even with very long exposures? If there is a choice between, say, 30 minutes at ISO 6400 and 28 seconds at ISO 100 (radical example, I know) is the difference worth the extra exposure time? I would think that there would be a point at which ISO begins to take preference over shutter speed, but I don't really know where that point would be.
  11. MK3Brent
    Offline

    MK3Brent Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,160
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Eastern NC
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +287 / 0
    Sometimes I shoot at 50,000 ISO.
    Low light and action. :D
  12. KmH
    Offline

    KmH Helping photographers learn to fish

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    34,037
    Likes Received:
    4,061
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +4,066 / 1
  13. 480sparky
    Online

    480sparky Chief Free Electron Relocator

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,917
    Likes Received:
    5,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Iowa
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +5,213 / 0
    0.8, AFAIK.
  14. Patriot
    Offline

    Patriot New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, Washington
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +91 / 0
    That's understandable, but doesn't the sensor stay exposed for long periods while using the video feature? Does it matter if the ISO of LOW during the same period of time. I ask because I see a lot of star trail pictures that were taken over a matter of hours.
  15. BrianV
    Offline

    BrianV New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    806
    Likes Received:
    122
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0
    Easy to answer the "why" of high-ISO. You need it to shoot in low-light with reasonable shutter-speed. No one asks why you need night-vision goggles.

    As to the "how" the sensors do it, how ISO is measured, etc, Truesense Imaging is the old Kodak Sensor Division.

    Downloads | Reference Documents | Support

    Products

    They have always provided good technical references on digital imaging. They cater to the Scientific/Technical market and provide enough information for their detectors to be used in instrumentation.

    ISO 2500, 50/1.4 Canon FL mount lens wide-open, 1/25th second shutter-speed. With one of the newer Truesense CCD's.

    [​IMG]

    Dimly lit diarama at the Marine Museum at Quantico depicting a night-time battle in Korea. Lightroom 3 export to Jpeg.
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2013
  16. xposurepro
    Offline

    xposurepro New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas City
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0
    Nothing to do with quality .. Everything to do with selling cameras
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Dikkie
    Offline

    Dikkie New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    (near Brussels)
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +64 / 0
    ² spot on !

    I wait until they have ISO 3.276.800 and up to. And hopefully they upgrade the shutterspeeds aswel, so I can shoot sooo fast that I can capture images of history into my camera.
  18. BrianV
    Offline

    BrianV New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    806
    Likes Received:
    122
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0
    The Nikon F Photomic of the 1960s meters went up to ASA 6400. Push-processing, push developing, grain big enough to count. One company went as far as installing lamps to pre-illuminate film to get it past threshold. Picked up two stops of sensitivity. "Need for Speed" is nothing new. Much of the gains of late are improvements in software and on-chip firmware. Improvements in base-ISO come mostly from reducing "dark-Current" on the chips, the amount of current the sensor generates without light hitting it. Basically, the noise floor.
  19. greybeard
    Offline

    greybeard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,228
    Likes Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    WV
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +284 / 0
    Faster shutter speeds, smaller apertures, better handheld in low light, and basically because they can.
  20. Derrel
    Offline

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,486
    Likes Received:
    9,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    USA
    Gallery:
    Ratings:
    +9,853 / 0
    Kodak's 14-megapixel 14n or Pro 14n (one of those two) d-slr had user-selectable in-camera ISO values down to ISO 6. (Yes, ISO six). It also offered multi-format capture sizes. It was one of the early 24x36mm AKA "full-frame" d-slr cameras, back in the early 2000's. It was geared toward commercial photographers, and others for whom LOW ISO settings would prove useful.
    I suspect that those ultra-low ISO values were "extended", and would be what Nikon would call "Lo-", as opposed to actual, calibrated, 100% genuine "ISO" values. But still...it would dial the sensitivity wayyyyyyyy down!!! Imagine--no need for ND filtration!!!
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page