Why We Switched to Nikon

The tone in some of these posts is quite combative. Can we let some stuff ride, please?

Let's keep things on topic. Thanks! :)
 
The tone in some of these posts is quite combative. Can we let some stuff ride, please?

Let's keep things on topic. Thanks! :)

Translation - The tone curve in some of these post processes is quite contrasty nasty. STOP IT! :)
 
tecboy said:
I still don't understand why these couples switched to Nikon.

I looked into their website a bit last week when this thread was in full swing: they offer three shooting teams, and the masthead photo shows five people in the group photo. Prices for the lead team of hubby and his wife are like $4,500 and up, second tier teams are,as I recall from last week, priced at $4,000 and $3,500 and up. Not sure how they run the business, if the second and third teams shoot studio-owned equipment or a mix of their own and studio gear or what.
 
I still don't understand why these couples switched to Nikon.

some people can afford to jump on every new "best" bandwagon.
They call them Muppets

If i could afford a Leica S2 I would have one.
I wouldn't, I would have an MP

the MP is too plain and boring looking....
i like the M2-R better.
Thats just an M2 with easier M4 loading, what about an M4P 70 year anniversary
 
I still don't understand why these couples switched to Nikon.

some people can afford to jump on every new "best" bandwagon.
They call them Muppets

If i could afford a Leica S2 I would have one.
I wouldn't, I would have an MP

the MP is too plain and boring looking....
i like the M2-R better.
Thats just an M2 with easier M4 loading, what about an M4P 70 year anniversary

It's nicer, but it's just a cheaper MR-2
 

Most reactions

Back
Top