Wide angle lenses

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Josh220, Jul 21, 2009.

  1. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have narrowed it down to 5 choices, but user reviews will only go so far. Does anyone have any recommendations or preferences out of these 5? It will be used on a DX body, so I'm thinking the 14-24 may not be the best choice.

    Thanks for any input, here are the lenses:

    Tokina | 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X 116 Pro DX Autofocus | ATX116PRODXN

    Nikon | 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor AF Lens | 2144

    Nikon | AF-S Zoom Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF Lens | 2163 | B&H

    Sigma | 10-20mm f/4-5.6D EX DC HSM Autofocus Lens | 201306 | B&H

    or something simple like this:
    Sigma | 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM Macro Lens for Nik | 582-306
     
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2009
  2. KmH

    KmH Helping photographers learn to fish Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    38,237
    Likes Received:
    5,008
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    More user reviews?
     
  3. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I'd like to get opinions on which out of the 4 would best suit the need for a wide angle lens on a DX body. I don't want to only read reviews of people trying to justify their purchases.
     
  4. gryphonslair99

    gryphonslair99 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    11,443
    Likes Received:
    2,100
    Location:
    Wichita, Kansas, USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I have the Tokina in a Canon mount and love it. I appreciate what the faster glass can do for both sports and landscape photography. It is probably the sharpest ultra wide on the market today from my experience and from several reviews that I have read. Good luck.
     
  5. SrBiscuit

    SrBiscuit TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    NH
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    any reason the sigma 10-20 was left off the list?
    just curious...as ive heard nothing but great things about that lens.
     
  6. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I had that one in mind, not sure why I left it off. I'll edit the first post and add that one. The thing that bothers me about that lens is that it's f/4-5.6. I was trying to stick with f/2.8 or f/4 at the highest.
     
  7. SrBiscuit

    SrBiscuit TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,721
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    NH
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    i hear ya...the nikkor 14-24 would be sick, but man what a pricetag. (and like you said, on a crop youre looking at 21mm equiv)

    i guess the good middle ground with width and speed would be the tokina.
    if i had the loot that might be my pick. little over 100 more than the sigma, but much improved speed
     
  8. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    It would be nice to have but it won't be worth the money on a DX body.
     
  9. icassell

    icassell TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,893
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Arizona
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I will note that I have never had speed issues with my Sigma. I usually stop it down pretty far to take advantage of the incredible depth of field. I don't often use it for moving targets in reduced light and I do most landscape work on a tripod. I can, however, reliably hand-hold it at pretty slow shutter speeds as well (I've had good results at 1/20 sec). Although a faster lens might be nice for some applications, I'm not sure it's worth the additional cost in a UWA.
     
  10. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    That's true. How's the Sigma quality?
     
  11. icassell

    icassell TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,893
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Arizona
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
     
  12. Josh220

    Josh220 No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    California
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Great, thanks!

    Anyone else have anything for these lens choices?
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

compare the difference between nikon lens #2144 & #2163