Wide aperture vs. high ISO... Is my reasoning good here?

Discussion in 'Beyond the Basics' started by splproductions, Nov 19, 2012.

  1. splproductions

    splproductions TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    12
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    So next year I'll be going to the Dominican Republic for humanitarian work and I'm trying to decide which lenses to bring. The goal is to bring the smallest and the fewest lenses so I don't look like an attractive target to a thief. I'm not going to bring a Speedlite.

    Last night I was thinking through this... let me know if this reasoning sounds logical or not.

    I already know I'm going to be in low-light situations in the buildings we'll be working in (no power most of the time). So for one of my lenses, you would think it would make more sense to bring a 50mm 1.4 instead of a 40mm 2.8, right?

    However...

    The 40mm at 2.8 is much sharper than the 50mm at around 1.6. So to get the same exposure with the 40mm, I have to up the ISO quite a bit. But I can remove noise fairly easily and get a quality pic, but I can't really sharpen up a photo that wasn't sharp in the first place.

    So it seems to make more sense to me to bring the 40mm (plus it's small enough to fit in my pocket - which would be a huge plus).

    Does that make sense? Any thoughts?
     
  2. Underdeveloped

    Underdeveloped TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Drumheller, AB, Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    the 40 makes more sense to me, but why not a cheeper wide angle zoom. That way, if it's stolen, you're only out a small amount of coin? (just thinking of indoor shots of tight spaces at 40mm vs 24 or 18)
     
  3. splproductions

    splproductions TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    12
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'm pretty much ruling out zooms because I feel like even 2.8 would be pushing it with the available light I'll have (I've done this trip before). A 3.5-5.6 zoom would be worthless (since I don't want to bring a Speedlite and I'm not going to use pop-up flash). I would feel nervous as heck bringing my 24-70 just because of how big and "professional" it looks.

    If I bring a cheap zoom, which would require me to use pop-up flash... I might as well just use a P&S. I used a P&S this summer for this same trip and just was not pleased at all with the results.

    40mm is pretty tight. But I think most of the shots that I want to look "pro" will be close-up work anyway. I think I'm going to bring an 85mm as well for street stuff. For the group shots indoors, someone's iPhone will suffice.
     
  4. BobSaget

    BobSaget TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    29
    Location:
    New Olreans
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You could by a holga bounce flash for $10 and not care if it gets stolen or give it away at the end of your trip.
     
  5. MLeeK

    MLeeK TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    6,761
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Location:
    NY
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I think it'd make more sense to take the speedlite. You are working in dark buildings. You aren't going to get good results even with an incredibly fast lens and maximum ISO.
     
  6. amolitor

    amolitor TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    May 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    2,134
    Location:
    Virginia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Would you use the 50mm wide open?

    If so, you're gonna have to go up two stops, and I bet you're not going to be starting off at ISO 100, so you're getting in to the Land Of Noise big time.

    If you'd never use the 50 any wider than f/2.0 or whatever, and you ARE willing to use the 40 wide open, go for the 40. If you're always going to be two stops slower, take the 50.
     
  7. enzodm

    enzodm No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    118
    Location:
    Italy
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    For me, 40 or 50mm inside a building may be too long.
    By the way, noise is never just removed with no consequences: it brings away some sharpness too.
     
  8. KmH

    KmH Helping photographers learn to fish Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    37,201
    Likes Received:
    4,790
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    +1 on - Take a hot shoe flash unit.
     
  9. The_Traveler

    The_Traveler Completely Counter-dependent Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,247
    Likes Received:
    7,097
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic US
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Insure your stuff and take whatever gets the best image.
     
  10. bratkinson

    bratkinson No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,538
    Likes Received:
    297
    Location:
    Western MA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    If I were going there, I'd probably pick up a used 40D or 50D, a used 440 EX, and a used 18-135 f3.5-5.6 and go with just that. I might also pack the 50 f1.4 as well, for low light situations where the flash can't be used. When I had an EF-S 18-135, I found it was a great all-around lens, but needed flash indoors.

    With a total investment target of about $700-800, if it gets lost or stolen, it would certainly 'hurt', but not as bad as losing a 24-70 + body + <whatever else>.
     
  11. jaomul

    jaomul Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    4,660
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Location:
    Cork Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Canon? EF35mm f/2. Cheap fast and wide
     
  12. Dikkie

    Dikkie No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    100
    Location:
    (near Brussels)
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit

    I think the same, but without the speedlite.
    I'd take a stable mini-tripod with me, and use longer shuttertimes instead. So I don't need to worry about the large aperture or the high iso. That way you can carry a cheaper zoom too, like 18-55mm ?

    You'll always have to shoot from the floor or on top of something, that will be your only disability.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

high aperture high iso

,

high aperture vs speedlight

,

large aperture or high iso

,

mw 306387 85

,

speedlight vs wide aperture

,

what is wider aperture 28 or. 35

,

wide aperture vs high iso video

,

with high iso do yu need large apature