That's very nice.
And it's a really old body right now, Canon needs to get their **** together.
I can't wait to see D500 stuff.
EDIT: Looked at a few more images, seems like the 6400 on D7100 is a bit better then 3200 on my T2i. Oh well.
Yes! I agree! Nikon is a good example of MPIX going up along with high ISO performance but Canon has been slacking
in that department for 5 years now so that's why I'm worried. If 80D doesn't outperform 7D markII in high ISO, or let's
say.. it does about the same.. then 24mpix over 20mpix...
The only thing that would get me to consider 80D rather then 7D markII is better high ISO performance, and I'm not
holding my breath since they went up in megapixel count which usually makes the high ISO performance worse
(all other things being equal).
The 750D/760D (T6i/T6s) use a 24mpix...
I'm in the same boat but 7d markII still seems like a better choice to me, but I'll probably pick the one
that does better in high ISO (which will still likely be the 7d markII). If they're about the same, I'd get
the 80D because of the higher resolution.
Then again.. I'd like to have the...
..and this is what a lot of people don't understand.
They use a APS-C body with the 18-55 kit lens for a year, then buy a FF body with a few high-end lenses and are blown
away by the difference even if they have no idea what they're doing. Obvious conclusion is - APS-C sux. D'oh.