You're welcome, pisto!
FWIW, you should never be nervous about putting up photos. Someone once told me something that stuck with me. "You don't learn anything from people telling you "Ooooh, your photos are great. You learn when people point out where you could have done things better."...
Beautiful. I'm not sure which one I like better -- they're both great shots. However, I'm always amazed at how quickly the sky can change and your pictures, taken just five minutes apart, completely underscore that point.
Zev Steinhardt
I came across this waterfall in Central Park over the summer and couldn't resist shooting it.
I love the fact that, had it not been said, you probably wouldn't have guessed that this is in Manhattan. :)
Comments, critiques and criticisms are welcome, encouraged and appreciated.
Zev...
Very nice.
On the first one, I wouldn't leave the horizon in the middle of the screen like that. Either make the sky the star of your show or the ground. Since, in this case, the ground is completely lost, I would have minimized it and shown more of the sky. Perhaps try cropping out about...
I belong to a weekly online group photography project. This past week's theme was "Body Parts." I decided to pull out my macro lens, my tripod and my strong light and see if I can get my son's eye to stand still long enough to get a shot.
Eye Macro by zev_ari, on Flickr
Canon XSi, MP-E...
I took this shot last October in Harriman State Park in New York. Each October, I go up there to take pics of the fall foliage and, for the second year in a row, one of my favorite shots turned out to be a picture that doesn't show the foliage.
(Canon XSi, Canon 17-40mm L lens @ 27mm, f/22...
The first shot is nice, but it looks like it was taken in harsh daylight, as evidenced by the shadows on the right side of the flowers. Perhaps some fill light could have cut down on the shadows?
The second one suffers from a very shallow depth of field. Perhaps if the in-focus part was in...