Search results

Thanks guys!

Quite a bit. 300mm definitely has its limitations. I have a canon tc1.4 that I've had some success with but I feel like I need a TON of light for that.

I've been watching a nest. This mature adult took off unexpectedly but I got em. Canon T6s with an EF300 f4 is. 1/1000 f6.3

Yes. Even though its bigger, it should be more accurate.

I'm not quite sure. There was a group of them scouring the ground. This one hopped up on the tree and started rooting around. :) He was scratching himself just prior LOL

For my children's sporting events a 300 f4 is a little too long at times. I pretty much have all access since I help coach all of them!, so I'm usually better off mounting an 85 f1.8 and getting down on the sidelines.

Carolina Wren that is.... :)

Developed and scanned today. APX100

Got a roll back today. Porta 160.

The 80d is better for Canon shooters, the 7200 is better for Nikon shooters. Neither is "better" than the other.

Yes. Sharp, very capable lens, IN GOOD LIGHT.

What focal length?

Very nice. he's really showing off!

Both. completely depends on what you need. I'll never shot a full frame digital but I still would rather have ef lenses if at all possible. there are some perfectly acceptable ef-s options.

I hate 50 mm for portraits! a fast 85 mm prime is a better choice in my opinion. even with a crop sensor.

Way to many variables! a night scene shot at ISO 6400 might look like garbage. a properly exposed bird in flight shot at ISO 6400 might look superb. and everything in between. The more you shoot the more you learn.

Porta. 35mm

Beat me to it...... ;)

A hand strap seems like a real wrist breaker for me. I'll stick to slings.