All things you don't need on a fisheye. They have nearly infinite depth of field.
Those are actually all the same lens with different brand names. I'm a big fan of their 14mm f/2.8, so I'd feel comfortable with one of those if...
You can get a 70-200 f/4L for the same price as the 70-300 IS. I'd take the better glass and build quality over the reach and IS. Sent from my...
My favorite lens! Enjoy it. Sent from my Galaxy S4
Which is why you just stop it down. You can't open a f/4 up to f/2.8, though.
It's not just the fact that it's faster. The depth of field created by f/2.8 is much more pleasing, especially on full-frame.
24-70. I'd never trade aperture over image stabilization given the equal choice. Sent from my Droid DNA
Canon S95.
No, the worst feeling ever is dropping your camera right before a big event and only getting an error when you try to turn it on. Thankfully,...
I suggest the 70-200 f/4L. Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk 2
The 70-200 2.8 II with 2x III is approximately equal to the 100-400 in image quality, but you can always take that TC off for the best lens in...
35. The 50 can be ever so slightly narrow indoors, even on a full-frame. Sent from my Droid DNA
I take off my grip when I want to be more discrete or just carry less weight. Sent from my Droid DNA
I can easily get 2000 clicks on two full batteries. Something sounds wrong. Sent from my Droid DNA
Probably the fact that it is over $1000 cheaper than the IS II and sharper than the IS I.
Definitely. You will be blown away by the difference in full-frame versus crop. Sent from my Droid DNA
In every way. I love the 50 1.4.
I'm jealous. I'd love to get one, but I just dropped $1500 on a new desktop. Sent from my Droid DNA
My 50 f/1.4 was on my camera almost constantly over the holidays. Indoors is much too dark to shoot at f/4 (or even f/2.8) without a flash,...
It's still pretty important. If that one stop of light is the difference between pushing my 5D to 12800 ISO or staying at 6400 ISO, I'll take it...
Separate names with a comma.