Well, obviously that isn't what is being discussed here.
Amen. And the sooner the better. When I read about nonsense like $10k for a digital file, I hope to see them out of business soon.
There is no 'hacker'. It's in the JavaScript of the ads they are running.
Yes, read that yourself. It's the website's fault with the ads it is serving. Like I said. Not my browser having anything wrong.
It's an iPhone running safari. There's no malware. That's the point of using an iPhone. This is the only place I've ever seen it.
It has nothing to do with"rebooting my phone". It's the ads they're serving up, only here.
I can't even read anything any more, because these stupid full page uncloseable 'contest' ads pop up and I have to reload and stop the load fast....
"I am a Graphic designer by profession and would love to have some hands on experience in photography so that i do not have to hire a...
You know what's a good idea? Not trying to get money out of people AND use them as advertising fodder at the same time.
if you were really doing it for "free", you'd give them the digital file. Many togs do free portrait sessions with the money coming from prints....
People, scam, hello? They have photogs in Cancun.
"in this situation" I am not speaking of "this situation". I'm talking in general. Your overly wordy responses are analogous to someone saying...
Bzzz. The photographer holds copyright. Whether he assigns or sells or whatever the copyright to someone else is after the fact. Also, I didn't...
Wow, I've never seen so much misunderstanding about copyright and model releases. Simply ( in most cases ): Photographer always holds copyright....
It won't matter to you because you can't deduct time spent on your taxes. Is the value of volunteer time tax deductible?
I'd boot you for being a PITA about something which doesn't affect the intent of the agreement which is about you selling prints. Not making you...
Well sure, you can make up whatever terms you like in a rhetorical license, but the OP said 'another party' which does not indicate a subsidiary...
Licensing an image to someone for their exclusive use does NOT give them the right to grant rights to others or allow them to redistribute it.
What? All non-editorial RF licenses are good for commercial use. Even free ones for the most part. The facility has no need for a RM license here.
Keep in mind there are a gazillion 'wildlife' images to license on stock sites for $1.
Separate names with a comma.
