thanks for the inputs. i tried the 1+100 semi stand dev with rodinal and loved the results, so rodinal is something i will stick to. to try...
never heard of the pyro hd, will look into it. How does it compare to the hc110 in your experience? I'm obviously not looking for any "magic...
I've been developing for a while and have so far only used rodinal. I have only been pleased when using slow films (100 asa) but never really...
your example is perfect, it's THAT kind of flatness i'm talking about. i barely ever get prints done in the lab, just did this time as i need to...
that's good news as i'm talking about prints. i'll be scanning some of them tomorrow as i'll be needing them so hopefully it will be the same for...
thanks for the infos. been looking at d76, too, which looked interesting. will need to have a look at some oz to litres converter to get a better...
Personally I think it's a matter of what and where. There's a lot of difference between a tag on the 60s council estate down the road, the same...
Just a quick question about the film. I bought some 15 rolls of 35mm for discounted price as was due to expire (october 2009) and only recently...
Hi all, I'm about to start developing my b&w films at home and would love a little guidance about which chemical to use. What I need is a nice...
the reason why you don't see the lens closing according to the aperture is because it gets into position when you are actually pressing the...
i have an epson v300, which doesn't do 120 but works very well. that just to say, if you can get your hands on a v500 (which does 120 indeed), you...
the ae-1 is indeed a great camera. which lens are you worrking with? the canon 50mm f/1.4 is amazing. i'll need to get myself one of these...
i personally don't like thinking about things too much, wether i'm songwriting, playing music or taking photos. i think often the good photos are...
number 3 is spectacular. great great capture. still, sometimes you just can't help missing the good old times when you'd have used an analog...
#1 looks good but im not too crazy on the angle. could be just me. you might have worked with a deeper dof as it softens up as it gets close....
snapping at a gig with a dark stage can be very hard. firstly, you don't want the shutter to slow down too much as musicians, to different...
good ones but way too over-done in pp for me, look fake and unnatural. number 14 is probably my favourite but still, way too much tweaking done...
number one would have looked like with more contrast and nice film grain. still nice job on both, after all that's the kind of shoots you can't...
what a shoot! love it
the last pair to me but i think, as fokker pointed out, the eyes should have a bigger part in the whole thing. i don't think number 1 turned out...
Separate names with a comma.
