Starskream666
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2011
- Messages
- 598
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- England, West Yorkshire
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Typically what doesn't get love is pictures beaten with a trendy hammer.
That being said, these aren't too bad.
I think the blacks in #1 are too strong, making her hair just an inky blob and the right side of the picture doesn't do anything.
And oversharpened- see the halos at teh arrows
#2 is just attitude that seems sort of out of place on an unmarked young face.
#3 - not a bad look but the railroad track cliche just kills it.
#4 doesn't look like her at all.
Typically what doesn't get love is pictures beaten with a trendy hammer.
That being said, these aren't too bad.
I think the blacks in #1 are too strong, making her hair just an inky blob and the right side of the picture doesn't do anything.
And oversharpened- see the halos at teh arrows
#2 is just attitude that seems sort of out of place on an unmarked young face.
#3 - not a bad look but the railroad track cliche just kills it.
#4 doesn't look like her at all.
#2 As I said, no forced expressions, just natural, so that is the natural face she must have pulled haha.
#3without the railroad tracks she would just be stood with a backdrop of trees which is probably more common/cliche, i really doubt it 'killed it'
#4 hahaha
Thanks for the constructive input on #1
What do you mean by 'Trendy Hammer' btw?
Typically what doesn't get love is pictures beaten with a trendy hammer.
That being said, these aren't too bad.
I think the blacks in #1 are too strong, making her hair just an inky blob and the right side of the picture doesn't do anything.
And oversharpened- see the halos at teh arrows
#2 is just attitude that seems sort of out of place on an unmarked young face.
#3 - not a bad look but the railroad track cliche just kills it.
#4 doesn't look like her at all.
#2 As I said, no forced expressions, just natural, so that is the natural face she must have pulled haha.
#3without the railroad tracks she would just be stood with a backdrop of trees which is probably more common/cliche, i really doubt it 'killed it'
#4 hahaha
Thanks for the constructive input on #1
What do you mean by 'Trendy Hammer' btw?
I quite like #2, actually.
Sure it's attitude that's out of place, but that's kind of the whole idea here. I read her as someone who's trying stuff on. She's trying a look on, she's trying an attitude on. She appears to be at an age where she's struggling to work out who she is, and it's ok that she looks a bit bolted together out of spare parts. Not, of course, HER, she's quite lovely, but her look. She looks like someone who's a bit of this and a bit of that and trying to make sense out of it.
The railroad track cliche lightens up a bit when you realize they're the tracks of a kiddie train.
#1 is potentially OK, but as noted the blacks are all flat and nasty. Her eyebrows (while obviously painted on) look like they were painted on in photoshop, and very very badly, since there's no texture left in them. The composition's pretty strong, but I think over-processed and possibly fatally underexposed. The smoke is a little whisped out and fragmented, as well. This sort of thing is worth taking a LOT of shots of, since the smoke is so dynamic, you're bound to get a bunch of good ones of her with stupid smoke, and a bunch of great looking smoke with her looking like a dork, and, if you're lucky, one where it all flows together.
The other two don't do much for me.
Typically what doesn't get love is pictures beaten with a trendy hammer.
That being said, these aren't too bad.
I think the blacks in #1 are too strong, making her hair just an inky blob and the right side of the picture doesn't do anything.
And oversharpened- see the halos at teh arrows
#2 is just attitude that seems sort of out of place on an unmarked young face.
#3 - not a bad look but the railroad track cliche just kills it.
#4 doesn't look like her at all.
#2 As I said, no forced expressions, just natural, so that is the natural face she must have pulled haha.
#3without the railroad tracks she would just be stood with a backdrop of trees which is probably more common/cliche, i really doubt it 'killed it'
#4 hahaha
Thanks for the constructive input on #1
What do you mean by 'Trendy Hammer' btw?
Did this man just say that trees are more cliche then Railroad track?