750 or 810 or 800e

Mashburn

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
265
Reaction score
21
Location
Georgia
Website
www.flickr.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Who wins the iso (until you see noise) , af, sharpness? Is there enough of a difference to jump up in price for ?

I do sports mainly. But my money comes from weddings.

Right now I have a d7200 . And I can return it to best buy if there is enough of a difference to make up the price difference. (yes I want full frame. But the crop helps me in sports because it is closer with more megapixels)
 
D750!

Best ISO (even though the D800 and D810 are good too)
Best AF (slightly better then the D810)
D810 is the sharpest but the different for the average user should be negligible compared to the other cameras.
D750 is the cheapest

D800e I wouldnt go for, either the D810 or D750
 
^^^..not biased by any chance??....lol,just looking at your gear...
 
Well any recent full frame DSLR is going to have better high ISO performance. The sensor is 2 times bigger, has bigger pixels so the grain is finer and noise becomes noticeable at a much higher ISO and diffraction occurs at a smaller aperture than crop sensors. The full frame viewfinder is very big and very bright as well, thats one of the first things I noticed when I got my D610.

If you are going to be shooting a lot in low light then the D750 is a good option, if not, there isn't anything wrong with your D7200, it's a very, very good camera as well.
 
Last edited:
D750!

Best ISO (even though the D800 and D810 are good too)
Best AF (slightly better then the D810)
D810 is the sharpest but the different for the average user should be negligible compared to the other cameras.
D750 is the cheapest

D800e I wouldnt go for, either the D810 or D750
How much of a difference in iso?
 
Well any recent full frame DSLR is going to have better high ISO performance. The sensor is 2 times bigger, has bigger pixels so the grain is finer and noise becomes noticeable at a much higher ISO and diffraction occurs at a smaller aperture than crop sensors. The full frame viewfinder is very big and very bright as well, thats one of the first things I noticed when I got my D610.

If you are going to be shooting a lot in low light then the D750 is a good option, if not, there isn't anything wrong with your D7200, it's a very, very good camera as well.
Yeah I'm feeling there isn't a big enough of jump from the 7200 other then crop.

And low lighting just isn't that bad enough for me to need the better one.
 
D750!

Best ISO (even though the D800 and D810 are good too)
Best AF (slightly better then the D810)
D810 is the sharpest but the different for the average user should be negligible compared to the other cameras.
D750 is the cheapest

D800e I wouldnt go for, either the D810 or D750
How much of a difference in iso?

From what I've read, the D750 produces clean files until ISO 3,000 and the D7200 1,300. Give or take of course, but you get the idea. Even beyond that, it's still VERY good.
 
D750!

Best ISO (even though the D800 and D810 are good too)
Best AF (slightly better then the D810)
D810 is the sharpest but the different for the average user should be negligible compared to the other cameras.
D750 is the cheapest

D800e I wouldnt go for, either the D810 or D750
How much of a difference in iso?

From what I've read, the D750 produces clean files until ISO 3,000 and the D7200 1,300. Give or take of course, but you get the idea. Even beyond that, it's still VERY good.
Yes sir. That's what I was reading. 1600 and 3200. Not enough for me to scream that I need it. If it did 6400+ iso, then I would get it. But just with 3200, I'm good.
 
D750!

Best ISO (even though the D800 and D810 are good too)
Best AF (slightly better then the D810)
D810 is the sharpest but the different for the average user should be negligible compared to the other cameras.
D750 is the cheapest

D800e I wouldnt go for, either the D810 or D750
How much of a difference in iso?

From what I've read, the D750 produces clean files until ISO 3,000 and the D7200 1,300. Give or take of course, but you get the idea. Even beyond that, it's still VERY good.
Yes sir. That's what I was reading. 1600 and 3200. Not enough for me to scream that I need it. If it did 6400+ iso, then I would get it. But just with 3200, I'm good.

When I had my D7000, I shot often at ISO 3200 with no problems. Sure there was grain..but it was a lot better than my Nikon D60!!

8264575499_4b1a51fc6a_c.jpg


Took this (below) with my D610 at ISO 5000. I'd say there is a difference. lol.

DSC_4757.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well, I own both the 7200 and the 750, and there's seriously no comparison with noise and dynamic range. I love my 7200 for wildlife (reach), but even at lower ISO the 750 blows it away. Having shot with all 3 cameras you named, I'd go with the 750 (which I did).
 
Well, I own both the 7200 and the 750, and there's seriously no comparison with noise and dynamic range. I love my 7200 for wildlife (reach), but even at lower ISO the 750 blows it away. Having shot with all 3 cameras you named, I'd go with the 750 (which I did).
How much better is the iso noise?
 
Well, I own both the 7200 and the 750, and there's seriously no comparison with noise and dynamic range. I love my 7200 for wildlife (reach), but even at lower ISO the 750 blows it away. Having shot with all 3 cameras you named, I'd go with the 750 (which I did).
thank you for the hands on report....for some reason I put a lot more stock in "hands on",than an interpretation of someone else's studies...not to say i don't appreciate that homework,either.
 
Here is something to chew on for me
D800e..... 1700$ used
D750.... 2000$ new

That there tells me to not to mess with the 800e. I know it's better megapixel. And that does matter for my wedding stuff. But I rather get the other stuff that is slightly better with a better af.

But keep it coming everyone. Thanks for your opinions.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top