Senor Hound
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 1,425
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- La la land...
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I don't know anyone from Japan (except Bifurcator, and he is really cool). But I think we should refrain from labeling an entire country as having pedophilic (?) tendencies. That's a hasty generalization, and it does not add anything to the discussion other than to hurt people's feelings. I can understand trying to help someone see your perspective, but namecalling only makes people retreat mentally and emotionally, both of which are counterproductive to the discussion.
The real question of child nudity is where you draw the line. I think we can all agree it is VERY difficult to determine whether something is artistic or obscene (or this argument wouldn't be happening).
So how can a government determine what child nudity is artistic or pornographic? From a legal standpoint, it would need to fit a written description so it could be properly enforced.
The easiest way is to ban all child nudity like the US has done. But another option is to have a review board decide. The US does this with their movies by using the ratings suggested by the MPAA. But many find this system horribly flawed.
So, to everyone who thinks this photo is artistic: How do you make a universal rule that allows some nudity and not other nudity? How can you make these situations as black and white as possible, or at least clear-cut enough to be able to properly enforce that which we would all find obscene?
For the record, I feel this photo is artistic, but I also have no clue how to legally allow this photo and not one of questionable intent. And truthfully, if a government could not adequately enforce the ban of child pornography due to, "artistic" loopholes, I'd rather see photos like this be banned then see innocent children traumatized and abused.
The real question of child nudity is where you draw the line. I think we can all agree it is VERY difficult to determine whether something is artistic or obscene (or this argument wouldn't be happening).
So how can a government determine what child nudity is artistic or pornographic? From a legal standpoint, it would need to fit a written description so it could be properly enforced.
The easiest way is to ban all child nudity like the US has done. But another option is to have a review board decide. The US does this with their movies by using the ratings suggested by the MPAA. But many find this system horribly flawed.
So, to everyone who thinks this photo is artistic: How do you make a universal rule that allows some nudity and not other nudity? How can you make these situations as black and white as possible, or at least clear-cut enough to be able to properly enforce that which we would all find obscene?
For the record, I feel this photo is artistic, but I also have no clue how to legally allow this photo and not one of questionable intent. And truthfully, if a government could not adequately enforce the ban of child pornography due to, "artistic" loopholes, I'd rather see photos like this be banned then see innocent children traumatized and abused.