Frequency
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Messages
- 8,864
- Reaction score
- 683
- Location
- Calicut, Kerala,India
- Website
- www.photosenzitive.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Were these taken before or after our last discussion on "chunks of land"?
Either way, you are getting carried away with the saturation. If you have the ability (software) to saturate selectively, do so and do it in subtle advances.
Honestly, looking at these, I would think that you just read a rule called RULE OF THIRDS. If that is what you were doing (adhering to the ROT) Get that out of your mind and shoot what looks most pleasing overall.
In 35 years, I have never once looked at one of my images and said "Oh golly gee, I didn't follow the ROT". I have of course thought that the composition did not look pleasing, and shot and reshot, etc etc.
Remember, you are looking for C&C, not just a pat on the back.
Do yourself a favor, when you choose to C&C comments that others have made - at least try and comprehend what you are reading.
"None of these images follow the ROT (the closest is #1) No kidding chief, that was the whole point,
Honestly, looking at these, I would think that you just read a rule called RULE OF THIRDS. If that is what you were doing (adhering to the ROT) Get that out of your mind and shoot what looks most pleasing overall.
In 35 years, I have never once looked at one of my images and said "Oh golly gee, I didn't follow the ROT". I have of course thought that the composition did not look pleasing, and shot and reshot, etc etc.
Rotanimod said:No, your point was :
As far as reading comprehension goes, let's start here: Why don't you brush up on the intricacies of the english language, such as knowing what the hell you are you are saying, so when you assert a point you know what message you are trying to convey?
It's abundantly clear you were making a patronizing blanket statement about all of his images when you suggest to OP he had just learned the rule of thirds. Further, keeping true to your barrage of irrelevant gibberish/nonsense, you posit to OP "get ROTs out of your mind and and just shoot what looks pleasing" when only 1/4 of his images might fall under the category of ROTs.
To sum, your response was patronizing, baseless, and irrelevant. You used your response to propogate the notion that you are somehow "above ROT's" and it's not even a pertinent factor to the thread. Who cares? It's not even relevant. And it's just narcissistic of you and corrosive to the thread to respond like this.
You should be a public defender or run for office in your town. Your writing has that appeal similar to an internet grammar police officer.
Next time, comment to him, not to me. He knows my C&C to him, we do it often. I'm sure he is a big boy and doesn't need you to defend him counselor. Either that or block me, that way I can't offend you with my C&C to someone who isn't you.
Rotanimod said:I'm flattered that your best defense it to tell me I'm too good at writing. But I hate to be the bearer of bad news: I didn't correct your grammar. I corrected your faulty logic.
Second, I did give him C&C, but before I give C&C I always read others comments.
Your comment warranted a response because of it's many faults.
I think you see that now.
okay all joking aside I ruined his thread by saying trollish, irrelevant things that were inflammatory by nature, sorry frequency
I do like them but i just feel they are overly saturated. You might also want to bump up the contrast and sharpening slightly.
Big fan of #2, reminds me of the tropics perfectly. I think your white balance may be a little cool on #3. Overall a nice set of shots.
Were these taken before or after our last discussion on "chunks of land"?
Either way, you are getting carried away with the saturation. If you have the ability (software) to saturate selectively, do so and do it in subtle advances.
Honestly, looking at these, I would think that you just read a rule called RULE OF THIRDS. If that is what you were doing (adhering to the ROT) Get that out of your mind and shoot what looks most pleasing overall.
In 35 years, I have never once looked at one of my images and said "Oh golly gee, I didn't follow the ROT". I have of course thought that the composition did not look pleasing, and shot and reshot, etc etc.
Remember, you are looking for C&C, not just a pat on the back.