Camera case completed!

JIP · Dec 19, 2008

Well done i have such a hard time displaying mine since I have so many different sizes they wouldn't fit so neatly together.

alexkerhead · Dec 20, 2008

JIP said:
Well done i have such a hard time displaying mine since I have so many different sizes they wouldn't fit so neatly together.

Thanks!

I understand! hehe See post #8 for my display of larger cameras.

ATXshots · Dec 20, 2008

Wow! Thats a lot of money in cameras! Do you use them all? That is awesome

alexkerhead · Dec 20, 2008

ATXshots said:
Wow! Thats a lot of money in cameras! Do you use them all? That is awesome

Thanks..lol

Unfortunately, there is no real way for me to use them all and actually enjoy it. I use 2 cameras mainly. My digital is a Kodak Z712IS, and my main film camera is a Canon AE-1.

Battou · Dec 20, 2008

alexkerhead said:
Thanks..lol

Unfortunately, there is no real way for me to use them all and actually enjoy it. I use 2 cameras mainly. My digital is a Kodak Z712IS, and my main film camera is a Canon AE-1.

You need to get your self an EF.....you wil find that AE-1 in the box after that

alexkerhead · Dec 20, 2008

Battou said:
You need to get your self an EF.....you wil find that AE-1 in the box after that

I have a T90, it just needs to be fixed(quoted $90 to repair).

The AE-1 is a fine camera though, here is an image I took of my T90 with it.

Battou · Dec 20, 2008

The T-series just dosen't have the feel the EF does, The EF is a rock. Shooting the EF you will find yourself forgetting it's a different camera. it's setup just like the AE-1 but has some features the AE-1 lacks like long exposures and mirror lock. It's also far more relyable than the T-series, less electronic things to go wrong and even if they still do it still works.

And BTW clean up that 28mm and put it to use, they are great lenses I have two, I love them.

alexkerhead · Dec 21, 2008

Battou said:
The T-series just dosen't have the feel the EF does, The EF is a rock. Shooting the EF you will find yourself forgetting it's a different camera. it's setup just like the AE-1 but has some features the AE-1 lacks like long exposures and mirror lock. It's also far more relyable than the T-series, less electronic things to go wrong and even if they still do it still works.

And BTW clean up that 28mm and put it to use, they are great lenses I have two, I love them.

Here is a shot I took with the 28mm on the AE-1. A bit grainy compared to the 35-70 and 50mm. I am sure I did something wrong, because I am a newbie with photo stuff, but I can tell you anything you want to know about my camera collection..lol

Battou · Dec 21, 2008

Yup, it's grainy, you under exposed what looks to be very high ISO (1000 or higher) film and corrected in post. When you underexpose the grain becomes prevalent. I've done it my self a few times

. Color negitive film has sufficient latitude for you to overexpose and get adiquate results, this also reduces grain showing.

Here are a couple I took with mine

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/landscape-cityscape/126226-underpass.html

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/nature-wildlife/128426-luna-moth.html

walter23 · Dec 21, 2008

alexkerhead said:
Thanks a bunch for the kind comments everyone!

I know several folks with equal or larger collections(one fella has about 600+ cameras..omg), but not many people have the time or resources to display them properly.

Hehe, mine just sit hidden in my camera drawer until I want to use one of them.

alexkerhead · Dec 21, 2008

Battou said:
Yup, it's grainy, you under exposed what looks to be very high ISO (1000 or higher) film and corrected in post. When you underexpose the grain becomes prevalent. I've done it my self a few times . Color negitive film has sufficient latitude for you to overexpose and get adiquate results, this also reduces grain showing.

Here are a couple I took with mine

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/landscape-cityscape/126226-underpass.html

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/nature-wildlife/128426-luna-moth.html