The FM2n is a great camera - flash sync speeds up to 1/250, shoots at all speeds without battery etc - but on the other hand it is significantly more expensive than other manual SLRs, and that money could instead be spend buying some quality glass instead. If you're planning to use a fully manual film camera a lot, for many years to come, then by all means go for something like an FM2n (or even an F3), or a similarly high-spec camera from another company like an Olympus OM3ti, Pentax LX or Canon F1. A camera like one of those in good condition will be an investment. It'll keep going forever and yet you'll be willing to pay to have it serviced anyway; it'll be tough enough to bounce off walls and at the same time you'll probably want to stop it from getting a scratch. On the other hand that may not be what you're looking for. If you just want a manual camera to experiment or learn with, or as a backup, you might be better going for something cheaper, like the FM10, FE10 or FG, the aforementioned Pentax MX, Pentax P30, Canon T60 or one of the Minolta SRT or XD series. They may not be as durable, but unless you habitually drop cameras from great heights that's unlikely to be a problem; they're still fairly sturdy for general use, even those partially made from the dreaded plastic. The real question is whether you'll miss things like high flash-sync speeds, shutter speeds over 1/1000 or 1/2000, or shooting without batteries (after all it's not hard to carry spares around). If not, you can get a nice lens or two with the money you saved, and still have manual control over exposure and focus.