nossie
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2007
- Messages
- 794
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland
- Website
- www.quitealright.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I bought the 105. It was my first L lens so I favoured more range of good glass over speed. It's a great range but I'm not convinced about the bokeh. I worry if I'm missing out. How much difference does it make to a shot? The f4 subjects certainly don't seem so isolated when compared with the 70-200L @ f2.8 but I know that's hardly a proper comparison.
I fell into doing some small gig band work - musicians lit in the darkeness by 3 measly lights so I know I'd like the f2.8 over the f4 for that work.
All in all I wonder if I should sell it and buy the 24-70. Would the financial loss in trading be worth the gains in quality (if there are any at all).
Has anyone compared the 2 lenses side by side? Would a 70 owner like to formulate some comparison tests with me?
Ray
70-200L-2.8-ISO1600
I fell into doing some small gig band work - musicians lit in the darkeness by 3 measly lights so I know I'd like the f2.8 over the f4 for that work.
All in all I wonder if I should sell it and buy the 24-70. Would the financial loss in trading be worth the gains in quality (if there are any at all).
Has anyone compared the 2 lenses side by side? Would a 70 owner like to formulate some comparison tests with me?
Ray
70-200L-2.8-ISO1600