D300 replacement? looking at D7100

its only a LITTLE smaller than the d200/d300. I figure with a battery grip on it there wont really be much of a noticeable difference. plus, i REALLY wanted the ISO performance increase and the newer sensor. since there doesn't seem to be a D400 coming anytime soon, the D7100 was it.
 
its only a LITTLE smaller than the d200/d300. I figure with a battery grip on it there wont really be much of a noticeable difference. plus, i REALLY wanted the ISO performance increase and the newer sensor. since there doesn't seem to be a D400 coming anytime soon, the D7100 was it.

I know but its hard to leave and old friend on the side of the road.
 
According to what Nikon said after the D7100 release, the D7100 is NOT the DX flagship. So apparently the D400 is still in the making. Really takes them a long time though. The D300 is from 2007, the D300s is from 2009 (and didnt get a new sensor either). So the D300(s) has a 6 year old sensor now. There has been *some* improvements in this department ever since. An upgrade would be kinda nice to have now, really.


[...] yea, buffer size isn't really a deal breaker for us. [...]
Then AFAICS the D7100 is perfect for you.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top