Firstly apologies for asking a question I'm sure has been asked a thousand times, but looks like this is a very helpful forum!
I've spent past week trying to decide between D5100 and D3200 and change my mind on a daily basis...I appreciate D7000 may be even better than these, but as a beginner looking to get into photography, I've had to rule that out.
My main concerns are:
1) Have heard noise at higher ISO/low light for D3200 is worse than D5100 - is this a real concern? From excellent book I've been reading (Landscape Photography Workshop), all picture are taken at 100 or 200 ISO. How often do photographers really need 1600 ISO when starting out?
2) I'd like to get best quality pictures possible. Video doesn't concern me.
3) Cropping photos is something I can see myself doing - therefore thought D3200 may be better for this? Although 16MP still does seem a lot on D5100, especially if quality is better and there is less noise.
4) Again if I take a good photo, I'd potentially like to blow it up to put on my wall at home - thinking to 60x40cm size. Are both cameras equally suitable for this, or would D3200 have the edge at this size? Obviously I won't be doing this on a daily basis though!
5) Heard D5100 has HDR but only for JPG - therefore is this neglible as heard RAW is the way to go!
6) The D3200 weighs slightly less which is always appealing to someone who's used to a point and shoot.
Apologies for amount of points - if someone says D5100 is far better quality, that'll definitely sway me. Contrary to a lot of opinion on here, local indepent camera shop recommended D3200 as said "who wants older sensor - newer D3200 will be better as a year more recent" They also said HDR was better done on Photoshop rather than on camera.
I've handled both and they feel pretty identical, although D3200 is slightly slightly lighter...
Many thanks for those who've read my points! As you can tell, I'm pretty confused and can see pro's and cons of both...slightly swaying towards D3200 body and maybe better lens - any recommendations gratefully appreciated from sunny Salisbury!
I've spent past week trying to decide between D5100 and D3200 and change my mind on a daily basis...I appreciate D7000 may be even better than these, but as a beginner looking to get into photography, I've had to rule that out.
My main concerns are:
1) Have heard noise at higher ISO/low light for D3200 is worse than D5100 - is this a real concern? From excellent book I've been reading (Landscape Photography Workshop), all picture are taken at 100 or 200 ISO. How often do photographers really need 1600 ISO when starting out?
2) I'd like to get best quality pictures possible. Video doesn't concern me.
3) Cropping photos is something I can see myself doing - therefore thought D3200 may be better for this? Although 16MP still does seem a lot on D5100, especially if quality is better and there is less noise.
4) Again if I take a good photo, I'd potentially like to blow it up to put on my wall at home - thinking to 60x40cm size. Are both cameras equally suitable for this, or would D3200 have the edge at this size? Obviously I won't be doing this on a daily basis though!
5) Heard D5100 has HDR but only for JPG - therefore is this neglible as heard RAW is the way to go!
6) The D3200 weighs slightly less which is always appealing to someone who's used to a point and shoot.
Apologies for amount of points - if someone says D5100 is far better quality, that'll definitely sway me. Contrary to a lot of opinion on here, local indepent camera shop recommended D3200 as said "who wants older sensor - newer D3200 will be better as a year more recent" They also said HDR was better done on Photoshop rather than on camera.
I've handled both and they feel pretty identical, although D3200 is slightly slightly lighter...
Many thanks for those who've read my points! As you can tell, I'm pretty confused and can see pro's and cons of both...slightly swaying towards D3200 body and maybe better lens - any recommendations gratefully appreciated from sunny Salisbury!