Nomad57
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Toronto area
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Sometimes, when I see how a product is made, and see how it works, I just have to wonder what the manufacturer was thinking. I bought my first digital camera, a Canon A480, five years ago. It basically did what I expected of it. Recently, I decided to get a newer version, the A1400, and got some surprises. One of the first was that on Auto, the images on the 1400 are not as good as the A480, because it selects a higher ISO (and a correspondingly faster shutter speed). I had to resort to Program mode to get similar results. Also, my A480 came with two cables, one to connect to the computer, the other to connect to a TV. When I connected to a TV, the signal was transferred from the LCD to the TV screen, and I could view any still image or movie I had recorded on the TV. I could also view any movie on the TV while it was being recorded. This offered two benefits: it conserved battery life, since the LCD was now dark, and it allowed me to see the image that was being recorded, while it was being recorded, allowing me to check composition, and so on, when I was in front of, rather than behind the camera. The A1400 does not do this. It only allows playback on the TV, but not monitoring the recording. The LCD remains on. Not so much an issue, with the amount of battery power the A1400 has, but is surely an issue with Lithiums. I don't know what they were thinking. I mean, after all, the whole point of plugging the camera in (with the now optional accessory, $30 cable), is to transfer the image to the TV. I started looking for other Canon cameras that might do this, and found none. I looked at some Nikons, and they don't do it either.
I was thinking about getting a better camera than the A1400, and spent a couple of weeks doing research. In many cases, the reviews suggested that the current model is not as good as the model it supersedes. The A1400 is not as good as the A480, the ELPH 340 is not as good as the ELPH 330. The SX170 is not as good as the SX160. The SX280 is not as good as the SX260. The G16 is not as good as the G15, and so on. The battery life issue came in for severe criticism, as did the Movie Digest feature, which seems to be universally detested. If they were going to come up with this harebrained "feature", why didn't they have it take the three seconds of video AFTER the still shot? The way they have it rigged, essentially amounts to a three second shutter lag. What were they thinking? (A question posed by quite a few reviewers.) Another issue that I have discovered is that when I contact a manufacturer with a question about a camera, the answers I get don't always make sense.
Cameras are supposed to get better with each new iteration, instead, the reverse seems to be happening. Who are these people who come up with these ideas, and what are they thinking?
Nomad
I was thinking about getting a better camera than the A1400, and spent a couple of weeks doing research. In many cases, the reviews suggested that the current model is not as good as the model it supersedes. The A1400 is not as good as the A480, the ELPH 340 is not as good as the ELPH 330. The SX170 is not as good as the SX160. The SX280 is not as good as the SX260. The G16 is not as good as the G15, and so on. The battery life issue came in for severe criticism, as did the Movie Digest feature, which seems to be universally detested. If they were going to come up with this harebrained "feature", why didn't they have it take the three seconds of video AFTER the still shot? The way they have it rigged, essentially amounts to a three second shutter lag. What were they thinking? (A question posed by quite a few reviewers.) Another issue that I have discovered is that when I contact a manufacturer with a question about a camera, the answers I get don't always make sense.
Cameras are supposed to get better with each new iteration, instead, the reverse seems to be happening. Who are these people who come up with these ideas, and what are they thinking?
Nomad