Late last year I bought a Canon Powershot S30. Previously I'd take maybe 20 photos in my life but with a digital camera I just kept shooting and realised I really enjoyed photography. Now I'd like to get a camera that lets me do a bit more. At the moment most of my photos have been of friends and family but I'm planning on doing a lot of travel in the next few years so I'll probably start taking a lot photos of buildings and landscapes.
I'd like some advice on whether I should get a digital SLR or one of the better compact cameras. I've done a fair bit of research into it but not really knowing a lot about photography, and knowing no one who knows anything about photography I don't know which to pick.
The Minolta Dimage 7Hi and the Nikon 5700 both look like good cameras. They both have large zooms, use compact flash cards, have a good number of megapixels and full manual control. The Minolta seems to have slightly better manual controls and can have filters attached directly to it. The Nikon is a bit cheaper (5-10%), has a slight longer zoom (8 compared to 7) and is supposed to have better battery life which could be important when travelling.
On the other hand I could get a digital SLR. I could get one of the cheaper ones such as the Canon 10D, the Fuji S2 Pro, Nikon D100 or the Sigma SD9. An SLR would cost twice as much as the non-SLRs as well as the cost of lens so it would probably end up about three times the cost. However an SLR would obviously provide a lot more options as to what I could do with it.
I'd like to get a camera that will last me for at least a few years before needing to upgrade. I can afford the extra cost of the SLRs buy working a few months more before taking my trip however if its unlikely I'll use any of the extras of a SLR I'd go with a cheaper camera.
Thanks for any advice you can provide. I'm sure I'll have more questions before I buy a camera and will have thousands more once I start taking photos with my new camera.
Jockstrap
I'd like some advice on whether I should get a digital SLR or one of the better compact cameras. I've done a fair bit of research into it but not really knowing a lot about photography, and knowing no one who knows anything about photography I don't know which to pick.
The Minolta Dimage 7Hi and the Nikon 5700 both look like good cameras. They both have large zooms, use compact flash cards, have a good number of megapixels and full manual control. The Minolta seems to have slightly better manual controls and can have filters attached directly to it. The Nikon is a bit cheaper (5-10%), has a slight longer zoom (8 compared to 7) and is supposed to have better battery life which could be important when travelling.
On the other hand I could get a digital SLR. I could get one of the cheaper ones such as the Canon 10D, the Fuji S2 Pro, Nikon D100 or the Sigma SD9. An SLR would cost twice as much as the non-SLRs as well as the cost of lens so it would probably end up about three times the cost. However an SLR would obviously provide a lot more options as to what I could do with it.
I'd like to get a camera that will last me for at least a few years before needing to upgrade. I can afford the extra cost of the SLRs buy working a few months more before taking my trip however if its unlikely I'll use any of the extras of a SLR I'd go with a cheaper camera.
Thanks for any advice you can provide. I'm sure I'll have more questions before I buy a camera and will have thousands more once I start taking photos with my new camera.
Jockstrap