I'm beginning a process of digitizing a couple thousand 35mm slides with a Nikon CoolScan 5000. In addition to the CoolScan software, I also have the latest versions of VueScan, Photoshop Elements, and Canon Digital Professional.
The majority of the slides are 30-40 years old, and many have exposure and/or lighting issues that I'd like to correct. Dust and scratches will be an issue as well.
My goal is to digitize with optimal quality, wherever possible. But I have some fundamental questions about how to achieve that. For example, should I approach this by making raw scans at maximum resolution and performing all corrections (exposure, faded colors, scratches) post-scanning? Or should I employ the Nikon digital ICE, GEM, etc. tools as part of the actual scanning process to make corrections? Maybe it's a combination of both techniques? If it's a "judgement call," on what basis do I judge?
I'm sure I have more questions, but I thought I'd start at a fundamental level and then hit details as warranted. Any experience or lessons learned on this would be appreciated!
Tom
The majority of the slides are 30-40 years old, and many have exposure and/or lighting issues that I'd like to correct. Dust and scratches will be an issue as well.
My goal is to digitize with optimal quality, wherever possible. But I have some fundamental questions about how to achieve that. For example, should I approach this by making raw scans at maximum resolution and performing all corrections (exposure, faded colors, scratches) post-scanning? Or should I employ the Nikon digital ICE, GEM, etc. tools as part of the actual scanning process to make corrections? Maybe it's a combination of both techniques? If it's a "judgement call," on what basis do I judge?
I'm sure I have more questions, but I thought I'd start at a fundamental level and then hit details as warranted. Any experience or lessons learned on this would be appreciated!
Tom