Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
+++The 70-200 f2.8 II IS is going to be a lot more versatile.
If you have to ask the question, go with the 70-200 f2.8 II. The only reason you should get the 135 f2/L is if you already know why you need it over the 70-200.
Excellent question! Individual lenses vary from the norm, but in general, prime lenses have fewer glass elements, and are engineered to produce the best results (aside from factors of practical manufacturing limits) at that particular focal length. As such, you might expect superior results in the areas of micro-contrast, color rendition, and bokeh (the quality of the OOF blur) with most primes.Want to try outdoor portrait. Would it be better with 135 f/2L lens than 70-200 f/2.8 II IS?
Excellent question! Individual lenses vary from the norm, but in general, prime lenses have fewer glass elements, and are engineered to produce the best results (aside from factors of practical manufacturing limits) at that particular focal length. As such, you might expect superior results in the areas of micro-contrast, color rendition, and bokeh (the quality of the OOF blur) with most primes.Want to try outdoor portrait. Would it be better with 135 f/2L lens than 70-200 f/2.8 II IS?
Since I am not familiar with the Canon lenses, you should look at some straight-out-of-the-camera examples made with both lenses. Another possible method is to read reviews of both lenses written by people who know what they're talking about. (good luck finding such reviews)
Zoom lenses are made to optimize framing in camera. That function usually requires more glass elements and the necessary mechanical capability to change focal lengths, which will compromise image quality. With more glass for the light to go through, the image quality may be lacking in the qualities I mentioned above. Additionally, the mechanical movement in the lens going from one focal length to another often induces distortion.
Therefore, my pure guess is that the prime should produce better image quality than the zoom. If you learn to "frame wide" using a prime, and crop later in post-capture editing, you'll not miss having a zoom.
I did not say that in so many words. A careful reading of my statement will show you that I said "in general", and then later said "might expect", and even later I wrote "my guess", accompanied by a suggestion to examine the IQ of each.In other words, the single focal length lens will always outperform the zoom lens.
I agree that lens technology has "improved", but I would like to know if you think the improvements have been in the area of micro-contrast, color rendition, and bokeh, among other qualities associated with IQ.The important issue is whether the difference in performance of the prime lens is worth giving up for the added versatility of the zoom. For most people, frankly it is. That is why zoom lenses are so popular. The opposite was true 20 years ago. Zoom lens technology has really improved over those years.
I did not say that in so many words. A careful reading of my statement will show you that I said "in general", and then later said "might expect", and even later I wrote "my guess", accompanied by a suggestion to examine the IQ of each.In other words, the single focal length lens will always outperform the zoom lens.
I agree that lens technology has "improved", but I would like to know if you think the improvements have been in the area of micro-contrast, color rendition, and bokeh, among other qualities associated with IQ.The important issue is whether the difference in performance of the prime lens is worth giving up for the added versatility of the zoom. For most people, frankly it is. That is why zoom lenses are so popular. The opposite was true 20 years ago. Zoom lens technology has really improved over those years.
FWIW: Recently I realized that the main purpose and advantages in zoom lenses were born in the days of film photography, where significant cropping would often leave the photograph lacking in sharpness. IOW: The need for zooms has been eclipsed by modern digital sensors that can (sometimes) out-resolve the lens that is put on the front.
Yes, people will still like and use zooms, so it will probably come down to personal preference.
Therefore, my pure guess is that the prime should produce better image quality than the zoom. If you learn to "frame wide" using a prime, and crop later in post-capture editing, you'll not miss having a zoom.Want to try outdoor portrait. Would it be better with 135 f/2L lens than 70-200 f/2.8 II IS?
honestly, I think the actual end-product of these two lenses, used properly, would be pretty hard to tell apart anyway.