wonkavision
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Banned
- #1
[deleted by user]
Last edited:
If you figure out how to take pictures just for yourself and get paid for it, write a book, you'll get rich.I just want to take pictures for myself and get paid for it.
Work as a second for a busy photographer. They pay me a small fee for the day, and then split the money from any of my prints that sell.
Do you think it would be better to skip the complicated arrangements and go straight to, "I charge $X and don't guarantee anything"?
And what makes you think someone will pay you for that...?Another possibility is to just crash weddings.
Or do test shoots for models.
...Depends how much the prints are. Not saying you should sell them at cost - but there's a big difference between charging $600 +prints and just selling the prints.A problem with relying on print sales: If a client can't afford a $600 photographer, they probably can't afford prints.
Weddings are usually held on private property so this is an excellent way to get arrested and sully the industry in general.Another possibility is to just crash weddings.
No, not probably. They ARE unworkable.Shadowing a working photographer is a good idea, and I do intend to do that. If nothing else, it's better than watching a video. Hell, I might even make a video and work out a deal with the photographer to split sales of it. Or sell it to him outright for use as a promotional tool.
Another possibility is to just crash weddings.
Or do test shoots for models.
But that doesn't address the need to a) make money or b) build confidence. To accomplish those goals, you have to do paid work; or at least simulate paid work as closely as possible, which is what the ideas in my original post were intended to do.
A problem with relying on print sales: If a client can't afford a $600 photographer, they probably can't afford prints.
If another photographer knows he's going to split profit on sales of your prints, he's not going to push those prints; he may not even show them to the client. (Or may not agree to the deal, re: KmH's response.)
Maybe rely on prints, but also get a signed model release so I can submit the photos to magazines? (That's a real long shot, though, as far as making money.)
These ideas probably are unworkable.
It seems the best option may be to charge normal rates and sell my services with inflated or naive self-confidence like so many local photographers seem to do.
Or try freelance photojournalism. (Though this addresses only the technical aspects of building confidence. There's still dealing with people and knowing their expectations.)
You want to charge people to take shots, and tell them upfront that you can't guarantee you won't completely suck at your job? That attitude won't get you a job at a fast food joint.
Fun Fact: The reading comprehension test on the GED consists mostly of drawing only conclusions that can be made from the sample text.
When you realize no one is going to give money to someone for shots they can take themselves with a P&S camera that they bought for $100, come back and let us know how it worked out for you.
I didn't claim that, so I don't see why I would attempt to prove it to you.
I just feel like you are incredibly arrogant if you think you can just skip over working hard like every other photographer and try to con people out of money for a poor job.
Now we get to the heart of the problem. You feel I am incredibly arrogant for thinking I can skip over working hard like every other photographer. Let's explore that.
Would you pay a mechanic if he says he can't guarantee he knows anything about your vehicle?