Derrel
Mr. Rain Cloud
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 48,225
- Reaction score
- 18,941
- Location
- USA
- Website
- www.pbase.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I've owned a Bronica SQ model or two since the early 1990's. A 75mm Bronica lens is a pretty good lens, and does NOT suffer awfully from diffraction effects when stopped down to f/22. The 120 film and the roughly 6x6 cm square image means that f/22 is nowhere NEAR as bad as the tiny, crop-sensor Canon 20D image shown in the above-linked web article; as was mentioned above by a smart British film shooter, on a large-format camera, like a 4x5 inch film format camera, f/22 is NOT a diffraction-limited f/stop.
Even is you're shooting with a 6x4.5cm rollfilm back, do not worry about shooting at f/22 is you need the DOF.
Diffraction is mostly theoretical on 120 rollfilm, and a 75mm lens used on 120 film _REQUIRES_ that you stop the lens down to f/22 or f/32 for a LOT of scenes, just to get the desired depth of field.
Do not worry about using f/22 on 120 rollfilm; it is vastly more-critical to have sufficient depth of field than it is to worry about theoretically losing a smidgeon of maximum sharpness potential.
Even is you're shooting with a 6x4.5cm rollfilm back, do not worry about shooting at f/22 is you need the DOF.
Diffraction is mostly theoretical on 120 rollfilm, and a 75mm lens used on 120 film _REQUIRES_ that you stop the lens down to f/22 or f/32 for a LOT of scenes, just to get the desired depth of field.
Do not worry about using f/22 on 120 rollfilm; it is vastly more-critical to have sufficient depth of field than it is to worry about theoretically losing a smidgeon of maximum sharpness potential.