Hey!
I understand that Image Stabilization provides the equivalent of 2-3 stops faster exposures when hand holding shots due to the benefits of IS technology...my question pertains to faster non IS lenses:
A F2.8 lens aperture is, of course, faster than a F4. However, if a F4 lens has IS built in, is it correct to say that that lens is 'faster' than a non IS F4 because one would be able to hand hold a shot at a slower shutter speed than one would be able to with a non IS 4F? Typically IS lenses are noted for their ability to reduce camera shake, but does that actual benefit translate into what we coin the benefit of owning a 'faster' lens with a larger aperture: specifically being able to take a longer exposure handheld?
The reason I ask this question is because I am planning to backpack throughout Asia coming up...I had planned to take the 24-105 F4L IS and the 70-200 F4L IS b/c of knowing that I will be handholding most shots.
I recently posted another thread about this endeavour and many responded encourging me to purchased a wide angle lens. What I am now thinking of buying is the 16-35 2.8 L and combine it with possibly the 24-70 2.8L.
I love shooting sunsets and am wondering which would be better suited:
an F4 with IS or a F2.8 non IS
Thanks for your thoughtful response!!
-Colin
I understand that Image Stabilization provides the equivalent of 2-3 stops faster exposures when hand holding shots due to the benefits of IS technology...my question pertains to faster non IS lenses:
A F2.8 lens aperture is, of course, faster than a F4. However, if a F4 lens has IS built in, is it correct to say that that lens is 'faster' than a non IS F4 because one would be able to hand hold a shot at a slower shutter speed than one would be able to with a non IS 4F? Typically IS lenses are noted for their ability to reduce camera shake, but does that actual benefit translate into what we coin the benefit of owning a 'faster' lens with a larger aperture: specifically being able to take a longer exposure handheld?
The reason I ask this question is because I am planning to backpack throughout Asia coming up...I had planned to take the 24-105 F4L IS and the 70-200 F4L IS b/c of knowing that I will be handholding most shots.
I recently posted another thread about this endeavour and many responded encourging me to purchased a wide angle lens. What I am now thinking of buying is the 16-35 2.8 L and combine it with possibly the 24-70 2.8L.
I love shooting sunsets and am wondering which would be better suited:
an F4 with IS or a F2.8 non IS
Thanks for your thoughtful response!!
-Colin