Do you think that many photographers who would otherwise have opted for crop frame or full frame will go instead to m 4/3?
Discussion need some - well - discussion; subject, content, words - stuff.
Pictures (whilst they might generate discussion) are for the galleries
And from what I was aware the "M4/3rds flight" is more about photographers with DSLRs buying M4/3rds hybrid cameras instead of high end bridge cameras for their "lazy I'm not a diehard photographer today" mode.
That's rather dismissive and assumes facts not in evidence.
Maybe it's because people can get enough quality from the m 4/3 sensor and lenses without the penalty of weight and cost that dSLRs impose?
So, the 'best' IQ is the only reason that pictures are good?
That is a pixel peeper sort of argument and really good in the abstract but it is clear that millions of pictures have been taken with equipment that has much poorer IQ than m4/3 affords.
Then he is the only one looking at the action. The crowd isn't. My supposition is he is waiting for the family, and/or friend(s), and/or team mate(s) of the subject to get there and/or get settled into place. I've been asked to do the same kind of thing when shooting various sports.