nerwin
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
- Messages
- 3,790
- Reaction score
- 2,066
- Location
- Vermont
- Website
- nickerwin.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I was having a conversation with someone on a YouTube video and some random person replies with this which makes no sense. Maybe it's a troll, I don't know.
No one is buying dslrs anymore? That's news to me. I see people buying dslrs a lot more than mirrorless. But I could be wrong, I live in a small state. When I was at Best Buy the other day, the mirrorless section was nearly empty while everyone was checking out DSLRs and point and shoots.
APS-C is designed for digital age? Umm any digital sensor whether 35mm, aps-c, 4/3, 1"..etc are designed for the "digital age".
Full frame sensors are out of date? What? Then why are they still improving them and making them low light monsters? I dare you, I double dare you compare a fx sensor to a MFT sensor in low light.
Sure smaller sensors are getting better, but a larger sensor will always be better. It's not always just the physical sensor. Software and processers are getting better too which has an impact on image quality.
DSLRS are in a terminal decline? Oh, yeah..I'm real worried.
Hey, I'm all for a good mirrorless vs dslr debate, but why bash full frame sensors and dslrs saying they are out of dste, especially Nikon's? Does this person not know that Sony makes a full frame mirrorless? Oh wait, it has a out of date full frame sensor and not a "digital age" APS-C sensor.
having lived with MFT why on earth would you want to buy an out of date sensor size like Fx. It was the size of movie film stock pressed into service by Leica 100 years ago. Modern sensors were chosen for their suitability for the modern digital medium and modern crop sensors are fantastic. Fx is for long term photographers that are used to the lens angles of film, if you have never had that dont bother. Fx is already in decline and will be a niche market in a few years time - yes I know hobbyists will now jump on me and tell me why i am wrong - why would i care, I know I am right, I just look at the sales figures, DSLR is in terminal decline, nobody is buying one so why should you? If you want a bigger sensor get an APSc its designed for the digital age. Personally i would stay with what you have got and buy a better body and some good lenses.
No one is buying dslrs anymore? That's news to me. I see people buying dslrs a lot more than mirrorless. But I could be wrong, I live in a small state. When I was at Best Buy the other day, the mirrorless section was nearly empty while everyone was checking out DSLRs and point and shoots.
APS-C is designed for digital age? Umm any digital sensor whether 35mm, aps-c, 4/3, 1"..etc are designed for the "digital age".
Full frame sensors are out of date? What? Then why are they still improving them and making them low light monsters? I dare you, I double dare you compare a fx sensor to a MFT sensor in low light.
Sure smaller sensors are getting better, but a larger sensor will always be better. It's not always just the physical sensor. Software and processers are getting better too which has an impact on image quality.
DSLRS are in a terminal decline? Oh, yeah..I'm real worried.
Hey, I'm all for a good mirrorless vs dslr debate, but why bash full frame sensors and dslrs saying they are out of dste, especially Nikon's? Does this person not know that Sony makes a full frame mirrorless? Oh wait, it has a out of date full frame sensor and not a "digital age" APS-C sensor.
Last edited: