Hello everyone,
I am Hendrik from Durham, NC. I am hoping to pick your brains from now on, trying to get a good grasp on this photography thing
I have always been interested in nature photography, something that I'll be pursuing a little more serious now than I have in the past.
I have treated myself to a panasonic fz50, mostly because of the big zoom, and the image stabilization. I have now noticed that I'd like a slightly wider view than the stock camera is offering, and I am wondering about getting a wide converter. (I also wouldn't mind seeing what a teleconverter would give me)
My dilemma is this; I am really not ready to throw a lot of money towards these converters, and would rather try something cheap.
I can get a wide and a tele for less than $100 of EBAY, and while I am really not expecting a whole lot, I am still wondering if even for playing around with, these paticular cheap lenses are still a waste of money.
Does anyone have any experience with these cheap converters?
Thanks!
HDJ
I am Hendrik from Durham, NC. I am hoping to pick your brains from now on, trying to get a good grasp on this photography thing
I have always been interested in nature photography, something that I'll be pursuing a little more serious now than I have in the past.
I have treated myself to a panasonic fz50, mostly because of the big zoom, and the image stabilization. I have now noticed that I'd like a slightly wider view than the stock camera is offering, and I am wondering about getting a wide converter. (I also wouldn't mind seeing what a teleconverter would give me)
My dilemma is this; I am really not ready to throw a lot of money towards these converters, and would rather try something cheap.
I can get a wide and a tele for less than $100 of EBAY, and while I am really not expecting a whole lot, I am still wondering if even for playing around with, these paticular cheap lenses are still a waste of money.
Does anyone have any experience with these cheap converters?
Thanks!
HDJ