aegean
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Seattle
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
hi all!
this is my first post here so hopefully i'm posting in the right section and the material i shoot won't offend anyone.
i mainly shoot glamour and landscape pics. i can't seem to be able to resize and optimize a jpg without losing quality. i see jpgs from Stephen Hicks and Playboy and the quality seems amazing while the size of the file is pretty small.
for example this wallpaper file is: 1280x1024, 96 pixels/inch and looks pretty darn amazing and it's only 400K in file size!
http://www.waaeg.com/wallpaper.jpg
as for me, i start from a RAW image that is converted to jpg: 2912x4368/240 pixels/inch/9.27 MB file size. im happy with the image quality at this point.
i then resized it to: 2400x1800/96 pixels/inch/3.38 MB file size and i'm still happy with the image quality.
http://www.waaeg.com/_MG_3425-2 full.jpg
when i optimzed it to 2400x1800/96 pixels/inch/420 K file size this is where i'm not happy with the quality.
http://www.waaeg.com/_MG_3425-2.jpg
my thoughts are:
1) how does Stephen Hicks (wallpaper.jpg) able to get such small size jpgs and maintain the quality. same with the playboy images as well.
2) am i doing something wrong here? is there a workflow that will allow me to get sub 400K file size jpgs and maintain good quality on 2400x1800 or even 1800x1200
any help would be appreciated. or if i posted this in the wrong section please let me know.
thanks
chris
this is my first post here so hopefully i'm posting in the right section and the material i shoot won't offend anyone.
i mainly shoot glamour and landscape pics. i can't seem to be able to resize and optimize a jpg without losing quality. i see jpgs from Stephen Hicks and Playboy and the quality seems amazing while the size of the file is pretty small.
for example this wallpaper file is: 1280x1024, 96 pixels/inch and looks pretty darn amazing and it's only 400K in file size!
http://www.waaeg.com/wallpaper.jpg
as for me, i start from a RAW image that is converted to jpg: 2912x4368/240 pixels/inch/9.27 MB file size. im happy with the image quality at this point.
i then resized it to: 2400x1800/96 pixels/inch/3.38 MB file size and i'm still happy with the image quality.
http://www.waaeg.com/_MG_3425-2 full.jpg
when i optimzed it to 2400x1800/96 pixels/inch/420 K file size this is where i'm not happy with the quality.
http://www.waaeg.com/_MG_3425-2.jpg
my thoughts are:
1) how does Stephen Hicks (wallpaper.jpg) able to get such small size jpgs and maintain the quality. same with the playboy images as well.
2) am i doing something wrong here? is there a workflow that will allow me to get sub 400K file size jpgs and maintain good quality on 2400x1800 or even 1800x1200
any help would be appreciated. or if i posted this in the wrong section please let me know.
thanks
chris
Last edited: