HorseLove2286

craig

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
21
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA U.S.A
Website
craigblank.com
Shot this one across the street from my fiends ranch last Saturday. I like the shot, but I am not sure if the lens flare kills it. I love lens flare, so I have a biased opinion.

Nikon D1H. 1/90th @ ƒ6.3. Focal length = 70mm. Cloudy +2 WB.

horselove22864qw.jpg
 

mentos_007

The Freshmaker!
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
9,324
Reaction score
102
Location
Poland, Sz-n
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
hmmm,... on the one hand the flare is a bit distracting IMO, but on the other... it gives some extra romantic feeling and creates almost dreamy atmospheare around the picture. I don't know yet what to think about the flare but I like the overall picture
 

Rob

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
6,217
Reaction score
134
Location
London
Website
www.ukphotographs.com
That's a tough one to call I think. I'd probably tend to say the lens flare isn't good, as the white horse has little face left discenible. As has been said, there's a dreamy feel to it. Does it work in B&W maybe?

Rob
 

thebeginning

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
3,795
Reaction score
30
Location
Texas
Website
www.danielcolvinphotography.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
craig said:
Thanks for the comments gang!!! I am a little leery of trying it in B&W. Pretty attached to colour. I will give it a shot tho.


I agree, leave it in color. I won't judge your composition since I know you would have already thought about what i'll say, and the comp is great anyway. i love the flare, personally. really adds a nice touch. only thing I wish is that it wasnt on its 'face' so much, but that's not always controllable. only thing that bothered me was the sky, it looks a little strange.
 
OP
craig

craig

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
21
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA U.S.A
Website
craigblank.com
Thanks! You may be on to some thing. I shot a bunch with various positions and intensity of the flare. Only the hot spot has the sky. The other part is mountain.

The flare position is better in this one, but the animals are soft. What do you think? This is basically the raw file. Needs a little work.

dsc22929wu.jpg
 

thebeginning

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
3,795
Reaction score
30
Location
Texas
Website
www.danielcolvinphotography.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
yeah the first one is better, the animals are a bit too soft on the second one. no wonder the sky looked funny in the first, it was a mountain :D

the flare thing is really up to you i think, as it could fit your 'style' or might be something you really like. if you like it where it is, use that one. it's subject to opinion in this case i think.
 
OP
craig

craig

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
21
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA U.S.A
Website
craigblank.com
Yeah. Flare is always better in the viewfinder. Makes me want to start a viewfinder/print in hand debate in the discussion forum. Anyway. I have a couple of this scene without the flare. They are just too "standard". Horses are tough, because I am always leery of jumping the fence. Last year I was able to cowboy up. After 8 months of not being around them I am scared again.
 

JTHphoto

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jul 22, 2005
Messages
4,387
Reaction score
73
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
flare doesn't really work for me here, but i think its just because it blocks the horses face/head... maybe if it was elsewhere... but i agree about the "dreamy atmosphere" :thumbup:
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Top