Let me see if I understand your explanation. You used for advice regarding an issue you have no knowledge of. If you did you wouldn't need to ask the question. Then with no knowledge of the subject to back you up, you decided what the "best" advice was and published a newsletter to advise others in a similar position.
Per you: "The value this newsletter provides is that the advice is proven, well researched, and comes from people who have had success with them."
This is a blatantly false statement since you can show it was well researched, proved or came from anyone who has had success with the advise provided.
This pretty much explains the value of not only your article by your method of learning.
Per you: "The value this newsletter provides is that the advice is proven, well researched, and comes from people who have had success with them."
This is a blatantly false statement since you can show it was well researched, proved or came from anyone who has had success with the advise provided.
This pretty much explains the value of not only your article by your method of learning.